Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71256B5DBC2 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 03:36:41 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 75754-09 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:36:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.csc.lt (mail.csc.lt [193.138.191.5]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD421B5DBC0 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 03:36:34 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail 12411 invoked by uid 210); 20 Jun 2011 06:36:32 -0000 Received: from mail.nsoft.lt by mail (envelope-from , uid 201) with qmail-scanner-2.05st (clamdscan: 0.97/13214. spamassassin: 3.2.1. perlscan: 2.05st. Clear:RC:1(77.240.249.53):. Processed in 0.011702 secs); 20 Jun 2011 06:36:32 -0000 Received: from mail.nsoft.lt (77.240.249.53) by mail.csc.lt with SMTP; 20 Jun 2011 06:36:32 -0000 Received: from [192.168.16.113] (unknown [77.240.249.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.nsoft.lt (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E1C88E26A for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:36:30 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <4DFEEA70.6000009@nsoft.lt> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:36:32 +0300 From: Julius Tuskenis Organization: UAB nSoft User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; lt-LT; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: generating a large XML document References: <4DFA5AA4.8090001@nsoft.lt> In-Reply-To: <4DFA5AA4.8090001@nsoft.lt> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201106/168 X-Sequence-Number: 44101 Hello, I'm sorry to write again, but as I received no answer I wonder if there is a better mailing list to address concerning this question? Or is there nothing to be done about the speed of xmlagg ?. Please let me as no answer is the worst answer to get.... -- Julius Tuskenis Programavimo skyriaus vadovas UAB nSoft mob. +37068233050