Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475BAB5DE61 for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 11:32:07 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 80563-01-8 for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 14:32:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0-rc2 Received: from smtp2.peak6.com (smtp2.peak6.com [38.98.137.9]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F75B5DE4A for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 11:31:59 -0300 (ADT) X-AuditID: 0a02cb1e-b7c9dae000007b76-d9-4eb2a5e1d626 Message-ID: <4EB2A5DE.80300@peak6.com> Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 09:31:58 -0500 From: Shaun Thomas Reply-To: Organization: Peak6 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yeb Havinga CC: Merlin Moncure , "pgsql-performance@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Intel 710 pgbench write latencies References: <4EB14002.1020306@gmail.com> <4EB15EB7.2000906@gmail.com> <4EB1ABD1.4060405@gmail.com> <4EB26129.3090700@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4EB26129.3090700@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.10.220.61] X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrOIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsXCxcQrpvtw6SY/g2vbNCzudH5ktLg+8xyz ReslCwdmj52z7rJ7XNg3jT2AKaqB0SYxLy+/JLEkVSEltTjZVinA1dHbTCG4JDEvJbEoRcEl szg5JzEzN7VISSEzxVbJSEmhICcxOTU3Na/EVimxoCA1L0XJjksBA9gAlWXmKaTmJeenZOal 2yp5BvvrWliYWuoaKtnFI0BCN0tG9+MupoKfTBWPfm5kbmBczdTFyMkhIWAi8XflCxYIW0zi wr31bF2MHBy8AmoSuz6LgZgsAioSqz/UgVSwAUUX7r7JCGILCchK7F91jhXE5hcQltj3oYkZ xBYVCJF4NuE5G4jNKyAocXLmE7DpIkC9R75uB7OZBQokdnRNB7OFBSwkdvzfCFTPBTSzk0ni xoWvYEM5BTQl2u/9ZINosJW4MOc6VLO8xPa3c5ghjpCTuNPwHOxkCQEFievL/ScwCs1CsnoW ku5ZSLoXMDKvYhQvLktMzsg0KyjOLSkw1CtITcw208tLLdnECI7e03I7GFdcUDzEKMDBqMTD K1i+0U+INbGsuDL3EKMEB7OSCO/6xZv8hHhTEiurUovy44tKc1KLDzFqA4NsIrMUd3I+MLHk lcQbGxgoifPOmbrOT0ggHZgEslNTC1KLYKqZODilGhjrev69W1bEnWXOKCgp9m3Gep9SxuNV p+02/VJ/WLZs+lZn/3UXTSZdF2X4WHt197Tt79dbryj5bnfdo099QuI2F27F+AfR70vsq6o+ ZFwKSzt+TIrznJbOxEYGBWXzFTkpZasi2RKd8mMZenX///lpL+y6xDFJULntzYuCwzPPz3u4 fzvXgp1KLMUZiYZazEXFiQCvAw2T6gIAAA== X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.101 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201111/43 X-Sequence-Number: 45554 On 11/03/2011 04:38 AM, Yeb Havinga wrote: > Both comparable near 10K tps. That's another thing I was wondering about. Why are we talking about Vertex 2 Pro's, anyway? The Vertex 3 Pros post much better results and are still capacitor-backed. -- Shaun Thomas OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 800 | Chicago IL, 60604 312-676-8870 sthomas@peak6.com ______________________________________________ See http://www.peak6.com/email-disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email