Received: from magus.postgresql.org (magus.postgresql.org [87.238.57.229]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B87FBEC7B25 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 00:41:39 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SmzQG-0001Z8-6i for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 03:41:38 +0000 Received: by pbbrp8 with SMTP id rp8so13871541pbb.19 for ; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 20:41:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=QO8QfNZGU3Cz9HQ3/woceXJtMFL0jQMPQOyi+woA0ms=; b=pJczb7/ZuZpjh2Qc/Fkqd+uNvjKX9+WtIKOz9p9iH0Z+Beh4EmmKe6ifR8pT17MrYX XQIAhx7Fyrn63wwvvm5NHE8pXDpqHjY67MAz+Ch1LMTEKq/DjzBHx+UB1e+Ur/8IhJda N0T61X5tNe4mgO6Lt5FXEnodc8nmfF/JxfpAWj3f7eeyzWUnN/YoZSXWhVhz2Rnjp+EW Uxbs70KGOAJILWT+mihf8WkQUjclxAiNjbwULCJbGHcALBNLIJ0EmGzNQ5D3B4p8i+YS fPGgP0V4QLfe62RjM6Ux7voTZe1c+UOPrV3yHsSlZGSPJeUk2jzyBM6T9NK9MrWQoFkU AiQg== Received: by 10.68.222.40 with SMTP id qj8mr33149499pbc.139.1341546082076; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 20:41:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ayaki.localdomain (124-169-169-118.dyn.iinet.net.au. [124.169.169.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id rg10sm20979529pbc.54.2012.07.05.20.41.18 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 05 Jul 2012 20:41:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FF65E4E.4080304@ringerc.id.au> Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 11:41:02 +0800 From: Craig Ringer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120605 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Reza Taheri CC: Greg Smith , "pgsql-performance@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Introducing the TPC-V benchmark, and its relationship to PostgreSQL References: <66CE997FB523C04E9749452273184C6C137CB88A82@exch-mbx-113.vmware.com> <4FF63E73.1080104@2ndQuadrant.com> <66CE997FB523C04E9749452273184C6C137CC5C395@exch-mbx-113.vmware.com> In-Reply-To: <66CE997FB523C04E9749452273184C6C137CC5C395@exch-mbx-113.vmware.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmRvDN0any0zEjREzGI+UOeyG2/PzZgY49+xXdY9KIKobmaZVXVgFonhKoW+8Ezeshwwdcj X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Archive-Number: 201207/40 X-Sequence-Number: 47221 On 07/06/2012 11:22 AM, Reza Taheri wrote: > Hi Greg, > Yes, a single-instance benchmark is a natural fall-out from the TPC-V kit. Our coding team (4 people working directly on the benchmark with another 3-4 folks helping in various consulting capacities) is tasked with creating a multi-VM benchmark. The benchmark is still missing the critical Market Exchange Emulator function. Once that's done, it would be natural for someone else in the TPC to take our working prototype and simplify it for a single-system, TPC-E (not V) reference kit. The conversion is not technically difficult, but releasing kits is a new path for the TPC, and will take some work. Please consider releasing sample versions early in the process, especially as such releases are new to the TPC. Giving others the opportunity to contribute different skill sets and experiences before everything is locked in to the final configuration is important, especially when trying new things. -- Craig Ringer