X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D278D52A0D for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 11:23:25 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19647-01 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 14:23:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.207]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5227352A09 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 11:23:14 -0300 (ADT) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x37so55488nfc for ; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 07:23:18 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hdI12fkAqS5vX/2HshcWxWlma2P3YKyyTUkPjXi+GsB2x9343IN9SmYJCKf9W67YpwKp8NpEAxDkwatnaaKBEUnRSK6AigMoaUPVqN7ogOFdNaRTZSuaNL50r+vQ1wimI6UxVulfP56wScYQ5uwsPJBvHKMIf24PZoE0lc3vwkk= Received: by 10.48.3.15 with SMTP id 15mr35731nfc; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 07:23:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.49.14 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 07:23:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4b09a0c050707072372e87ce6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 16:23:18 +0200 From: Jean-Max Reymond Reply-To: Jean-Max Reymond To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Surprizing performances for Postgres on Centrino In-Reply-To: <20050707140934.GB6139@alvh.no-ip.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4b09a0c05070705495df28801@mail.gmail.com> <20050707140934.GB6139@alvh.no-ip.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.076 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, RCVD_BY_IP X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200507/73 X-Sequence-Number: 13314 On 7/7/05, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >=20 > Do you have the same locale settings on all of them? >=20 interressant: UNICODE on the fast laptop SQL_ASCII on the slowest desktops. is UNICODE database faster than SQL_ASCII ? --=20 Jean-Max Reymond CKR Solutions Open Source Nice France http://www.ckr-solutions.com