Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 646F265015C for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:02:19 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 62609-01 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:02:16 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.236]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E95C264FC5F for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:02:15 -0300 (ADT) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so634322rvf.43 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:02:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:subject :cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:references; bh=t5RE1QXMUIi17TUpL6lB46yRmHCAZN67bgQQn1ir61w=; b=EzZsuYe4TMfA5IsU8PzNwPCk0Zooc3W+xvhxZOlBpQ++q9Pe8z6eoSYLEjwEOS/oWW 6MVY5u87EIIlyhrOBQtgLsM/uGy+BZZsB9lAXJSOO2fif7QkmItpP3X2A1dz895/1Y4y fFQWkyj3A6VVBYF+OY2I6MZonhHQSwxb48Vpo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=J+B7dosHMwv2YdBlCquTjdWTT25fXOs2CotXrZ6QzgSSnAZSLKHpGIQnK5QfE/jpk3 nWbqXpboi2gKCDTRxKvvofLXCFFJwToKhCsYMdzzYaoCpuOGBOeOZxRkah6hz+SqBVZT YfxRaZnnNUyF+NbCJlnpuN4Ee5BRdPJkUcLzc= Received: by 10.140.147.5 with SMTP id u5mr2782137rvd.166.1224273734840; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:02:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.77.14 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:02:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4cba5adc0810171302k1312920bx3a9a8cb6558a544@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 22:02:14 +0200 From: "Dave Coventry" Subject: Re: Annoying Reply-To Cc: pgsql-general In-Reply-To: <680cbe0e0810171226m669c82b0haf9671241cd4d066@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <48F85CED.7000009@batory.org.pl> <20081017072017.1039f895.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <74826FB8-0529-486A-A6A5-4C6DE161D3C9@hoegh.org> <20081017080103.ba3ca072.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <20081017084917.f6840c44.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <48F8E10D.10500@burntmail.com> <20081017191524.GL4218@alvh.no-ip.org> <680cbe0e0810171226g6ff3ba58s9c7e03b10771fd7a@mail.gmail.com> <680cbe0e0810171226m669c82b0haf9671241cd4d066@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.581 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=MISSING_HEADERS=1.581 X-Spam-Level: * X-Archive-Number: 200810/801 X-Sequence-Number: 139050 I am a member of a number of lists, some of which exhibit this 'reply-to' behaviour and I have also managed to adapt... to a point. Sometimes, however, I do end up replying directly to the poster rather than through the list. Tellingly, I very nearly sent this post directly to Serge Fonvilee. Without wanting to be too controversial, I have generally found that the lists which have the default reply configured like this do tend to be those that are dominated by members who are, shall we say, pedantic about protocol and 'netiquette'. Personally I would prefer the default reply-to to go to the list, but I'm not really bothered about it. My 2 cents. Disclaimer: If we are not talking about the default 'reply-to' behaviour of this list, please ignore this post; I came upon the thread late and it is possible that I am at cross purposes. Kind reagards, Dave Coventry 2008/10/17 Serge Fonville : > Altough I am not sure what the real issue is, > I do know that on (for example) the tomcat mailing list, when I choose > reply (in gmail) the to: field contains the address of the mailing list. > Based on what I know, this should be relatively easy to set up in the > mailing list manager. > just my 2ct > Serge Fonvilee