Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([98.129.198.125])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <sickpig@opinioni.net>) id 1TNmXU-00077A-6t
	for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 15:25:08 +0000
Received: from host36.ns3.it ([80.79.54.36] helo=mail.opinioni.net)
	by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <sickpig@opinioni.net>) id 1TNmXO-0001Xq-GK
	for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 15:25:07 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.opinioni.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A854E224B;
	Mon, 15 Oct 2012 17:27:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.opinioni.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (opinioni.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id l80R8-znhTT9; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 17:27:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.50] (78-134-6-72.v4.ngi.it [78.134.6.72])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.opinioni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA3244E2249;
	Mon, 15 Oct 2012 17:27:40 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <507C2ACA.3020503@opinioni.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 17:24:58 +0200
From: Andrea Suisani <sickpig@opinioni.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
CC: Craig James <cjames@emolecules.com>,
 pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Two identical systems, radically different performance
References: 
 <CAFwQ8rcvw4mSoJ9q+ouONCeB9dg1T9gAUV5J27MpVZrehRHayQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFwQ8rfm2AcuoFHDfBLA_hg7ffbsYNsrsaJPDqcOeGqaVW02OQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFwQ8rcyCKcoeEn62_QHMRSmJM03ULERtW6_R=3TaO0twOEV9A@mail.gmail.com>
	<5076D433.7090605@opinioni.net>
	<CAGTBQpYGyq70q_S_dUngSwB7yLbbCxetnfXpaMC9LEr7zL6iWA@mail.gmail.com>
	<5076DA4E.80504@opinioni.net> <507BC8DE.9050109@opinioni.net>
	<CAGTBQpaHGxo9iFWoTJhuU+eTOK13Q-YkQk+9QC7xuT5HDmbv6w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAGTBQpaHGxo9iFWoTJhuU+eTOK13Q-YkQk+9QC7xuT5HDmbv6w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-Archive-Number: 201210/185
X-Sequence-Number: 48144

On 10/15/2012 05:01 PM, Claudio Freire wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Andrea Suisani <sickpig@opinioni.net> wrote:
>> it seems strange that disabling
>> HT from the bios will give lesser TPS that HT disable through
>> sysfs interface.
>
> It does prove they're not equivalent though.
>

sure you're right.

It's just that my bet was on a higher throughput
when HT was isabled from the BIOS (as you stated
previously in this thread).

Andrea