Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([98.129.198.125]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TNzNI-0008JO-AD for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 05:07:28 +0000 Received: from morework.geizhals.at ([78.142.138.3]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TNzNC-00051M-Tw for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 05:07:27 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by morework.geizhals.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 581B81248283 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 07:07:17 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at geizhals.at Received: from morework.geizhals.at ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (morework.geizhals.at [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DwIl+2wgCp24 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 07:07:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.128] (mjyrouter [213.235.209.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mjy) by morework.geizhals.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6AB961248245 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 07:07:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <507CEB82.8040203@geizhals.at> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 07:07:14 +0200 From: Marinos Yannikos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Two identical systems, radically different performance References: <5076D433.7090605@opinioni.net> <5076DA4E.80504@opinioni.net> <507BC8DE.9050109@opinioni.net> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Archive-Number: 201210/200 X-Sequence-Number: 48159 On 15.10.2012 17:01, Craig James wrote: >>>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Andrea Suisani >>>> wrote: >>>>> I've googled a bit and I've found a way to disable hyperthreading >>>>> without >>>>> the need to reboot the system and entering the bios: >>>>> >>>>> echo 0 >/sys/devices/system/node/node0/cpuX/online A safer method is probably to just add the "noht" kernel boot option and reboot. Did you set the same stride / stripe-width values on your FS when you initialized them? Are both really freshly-made ext4 FS and not e.g. the old one an ext3 mounted as ext4? Do all the disks have the same cache, link speed and NCQ settings (for their own caches, not the controller; try /c0/p0 show all etc. with tw_cli)? -mjy