Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TiPte-0003Tm-UV for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:29:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TiPtd-0005On-Lv for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:29:17 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([87.238.57.229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TiPtc-0005OA-Ks for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:29:16 +0000 Received: from outmail149080.authsmtp.com ([62.13.149.80]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TiPtZ-0007aQ-A2 for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:29:15 +0000 Received: from mail-c226.authsmtp.com (mail-c226.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.226]) by punt10.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Kp) with ESMTP id qBBDT53a087826; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:29:05 GMT Received: from ayaki.localdomain (58-7-194-83.dyn.iinet.net.au [58.7.194.83]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id qBBDT0AG092615 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:29:03 GMT Message-ID: <50C7351C.30407@2ndQuadrant.com> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:29:00 +0800 From: Craig Ringer Organization: 2nd Quadrant User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?windows-1252?Q?Niels_Kristian_Schj=F8dt?= CC: Jeff Janes , "pgsql-performance@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Do I have a hardware or a software problem? References: <8F7661E7-D6D4-4334-8C6A-A8B6C56A2C3F@autouncle.com> In-Reply-To: <8F7661E7-D6D4-4334-8C6A-A8B6C56A2C3F@autouncle.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 X-Server-Quench: bba840df-4396-11e2-98a9-0025907ec6c5 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCdxZQATClZeVg0b BQteCiN5VAwpPBRK HVkIKg5MJUcNSQVJ NksadRtFaQRbaVxS HGQLWlZEUV57W2p/ aw4faA1DZVRPVgF0 WEtWQFdQERppT11z dGp6UmgFdwxEfn91 K0BhX3IVDhYrfUJ9 FhhJEW4PY3phaTUd TUlQJgpJcANIexZF bQUsUiAILwdSbGoL JyIJERcLGAAXBCMd Y0kNJEwfCU9DHjcm Sw8LBzhnGldNTm0o KBI6NVcGEQ4JKEI4 NVYkDjoA X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633235383639.1020:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 58.7.194.83/2525 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by punt10.authsmtp.com id qBBDT53a087826 X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-performance Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org On 12/11/2012 06:04 PM, Niels Kristian Schj=F8dt wrote: > > Maybe I should mention, that I never see more than max 5Gb out of my tota= l 32Gb being in use on the server=85 Can I somehow utilize more of it? For an update-mostly workload it probably won't do you tons of good so long as all your indexes fit in RAM. You're clearly severely bottlenecked on disk I/O not RAM. > The SSD's I use a are 240Gb each which will grow too small within a > few months - so - how does moving the whole data dir onto four of > those in a RAID5 array sound?=20 Not RAID 5! Use a RAID10 of four or six SSDs. --=20 Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services --=20 Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance