Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UDszM-0006lC-3B for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 08:49:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UDszK-000625-Fm for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 08:49:14 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:7903:4::125]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UDszJ-000620-Hn for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 08:49:13 +0000 Received: from mail-we0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::22f]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UDszF-0002XU-RM for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 08:49:13 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id x8so694352wey.6 for ; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 00:49:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=TkYCms8KafCosED16I67TRSOuahfrMZtu+UJNRL1Lwo=; b=LadntZ+1BtVhtYPtcSc6ZHmTQ7MRb4wIyllb1c1F5m1hNwUgbFoRiKBOMogWnggTRE FwS/heprw8PU7R/8tRMSFrY45PRvo/X8Bn2mMG7PWb0awaNfVlXC1a2mgv7c2BunLrfx CI5Up8Q7R0SfSzv9FU2PSj4tQ193d63Iow8edJkLcrwk91nvaLpVvOXX2fK9TvJiFDWU WvhSFks0RwCAbWYgnN4vGnSqKEG1kQJaE55Mvdf2yWh2X+bnp92/WBQuKQav7PeYoyNq QhyfPgb1Vmxjl3S/2E1G7BPcPZ77HqcbYcLcvleaV7CBfjYrx/KMoYk/9mBDVlG353xK Y0dg== X-Received: by 10.194.6.2 with SMTP id w2mr2247483wjw.10.1362732547427; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 00:49:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.73.37] (5357DA75.cm-6-8d.dynamic.ziggo.nl. [83.87.218.117]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fg6sm7998303wib.10.2013.03.08.00.49.05 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Mar 2013 00:49:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5139A68A.9000100@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 09:51:22 +0100 From: Yeb Havinga User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: CSS CC: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Anyone running Intel S3700 SSDs? References: <63CE3313-2627-41B2-9741-7C18BD5BB574@morefoo.com> In-Reply-To: <63CE3313-2627-41B2-9741-7C18BD5BB574@morefoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-performance Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org On 2013-03-08 07:48, CSS wrote: > > http://www.anandtech.com/show/6433/intel-ssd-dc-s3700-200gb-review > > Of most interest to me was this: > > > Anyone have any benchmarks to share? > I tested the 800GB disk with diskchecker.pl and it was ok. No benchmarks to share yet, as I'm waiting for the disks to be installed in a server. -- Yeb Havinga http://www.mgrid.net/ Mastering Medical Data -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance