Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UIVCw-0008Mw-62 for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 02:26:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UIVCv-0002LT-Lj for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 02:26:21 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UIVCu-0002Kz-St for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 02:26:20 +0000 Received: from [2404:130:0:10::40:2] (helo=mail.catalyst.net.nz) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UIVCp-00010h-Ft for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 02:26:19 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.catalyst.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4729633234; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:26:10 +1300 (NZDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at catalyst.net.nz Received: from mail.catalyst.net.nz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bertrand.catalyst.net.nz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NqVWe7aniCoR; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:26:08 +1300 (NZDT) Received: from [192.168.1.64] (122-60-64-230.jetstream.xtra.co.nz [122.60.64.230]) (Authenticated sender: mark.kirkwood) by mail.catalyst.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E423433199; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:26:07 +1300 (NZDT) Message-ID: <514A6FBF.2010700@catalyst.net.nz> Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:26:07 +1300 From: Mark Kirkwood User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130311 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Rees CC: David Boreham , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: New server setup References: <4D6D1410-2208-4DAA-BD64-69BE1FD94E55@autouncle.com> <513CADB7.4030803@2ndQuadrant.com> <20130314185424.GA28770@momjian.us> <51424333.608@catalyst.net.nz> <51425F52.6040607@boreham.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2404:130:0:10::40:2 (failed) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-performance Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org On 21/03/13 13:44, David Rees wrote: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:37 PM, David Boreham wrote: >> You might want to evaluate the performance you can achieve with a single-SSD >> (use several for capacity by all means) before considering a RAID card + SSD >> solution. >> Again I bet it depends on the application but our experience with the older >> Intel 710 series is that their performance out-runs the CPU, at least under >> our PG workload. > > How many people are using a single enterprise grade SSD for production > without RAID? I've had a few consumer grade SSDs brick themselves - > but are the enterprise grade SSDs, like the new Intel S3700 which you > can get in sizes up to 800GB, reliable enough to run as a single drive > without RAID1? The performance of one is definitely good enough for > most medium sized workloads without the complexity of a BBU RAID and > multiple spinning disks... > If you are using Intel S3700 or 710's you can certainly use a pair setup in software RAID1 (so avoiding the need for RAID cards and BBU etc). I'd certainly feel happier with 2 drives :-) . However, a setup using replication with a number of hosts - each with a single SSD is going to be ok. Regards Mark -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance