Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UXhmQ-0005rh-Go for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 00:53:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UXhmQ-0007tJ-0T for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 00:53:50 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:7903:4::125]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UXhmO-0007tD-Tj for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 00:53:49 +0000 Received: from [2404:130:0:10::40:2] (helo=mail.catalyst.net.nz) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UXhmK-0001wL-Mi for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 00:53:47 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.catalyst.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F8631D23; Thu, 2 May 2013 12:53:39 +1200 (NZST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at catalyst.net.nz Received: from mail.catalyst.net.nz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bertrand.catalyst.net.nz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7PVE9qgvU3j7; Thu, 2 May 2013 12:53:27 +1200 (NZST) Received: from [IPv6:2404:130:0:1000:222:4dff:fe88:a586] (unknown [IPv6:2404:130:0:1000:222:4dff:fe88:a586]) (Authenticated sender: mark.kirkwood) by mail.catalyst.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A9C567F74; Thu, 2 May 2013 12:49:17 +1200 (NZST) Message-ID: <5181B80D.70404@catalyst.net.nz> Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 12:49:17 +1200 From: Mark Kirkwood User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130404 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Lane CC: Gavin Flower , "pgsql-performance@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: In progress INSERT wrecks plans on table References: <5179E77B.7050601@catalyst.net.nz> <5179ECC5.2010206@archidevsys.co.nz> <5179F259.3010509@catalyst.net.nz> <5179F5C6.8070702@archidevsys.co.nz> <5180E3C8.3010201@catalyst.net.nz> <2121.1367417215@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <2121.1367417215@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2404:130:0:10::40:2 (failed) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-performance Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org On 02/05/13 02:06, Tom Lane wrote: > Mark Kirkwood writes: >> I am concerned that the deafening lack of any replies to my original >> message is a result of folk glancing at your original quick reply and >> thinking... incomplete problem spec...ignore... when that is not that >> case - yes I should have muttered "9.2" in the original email, but we >> have covered that now. > No, I think it's more that we're trying to get to beta, and so anything > that looks like new development is getting shuffled to folks' "to > look at later" queues. The proposed patch is IMO a complete nonstarter > anyway; but I'm not sure what a less bogus solution would look like. > Yeah, I did think that beta might be consuming everyone's attention (of course immediately *after* sending the email)! And yes, the patch was merely to illustrate the problem rather than any serious attempt at a solution. Regards Mark -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance