Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UfKXJ-0007Qb-E6 for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 01:41:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UfKXI-0005QP-UC for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 01:41:44 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UfKXH-0005QF-T0 for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 01:41:43 +0000 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UfKX9-0003WL-0Y for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 01:41:41 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.110] (mail.highperformancepostgresql.com [71.179.240.8]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MZhl4-1Uu7Yg0tpO-00LarG; Thu, 23 May 2013 03:41:33 +0200 Message-ID: <519D73CC.2050308@2ndQuadrant.com> Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 21:41:32 -0400 From: Greg Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Joshua D. Drake" CC: Merlin Moncure , sthomas@optionshouse.com, Tomas Vondra , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication References: <51957499.6050905@fuzzy.cz> <519991EB.8010208@2ndQuadrant.com> <519A8E29.60702@fuzzy.cz> <519C0EFD.9080002@2ndQuadrant.com> <519CF8CC.1030204@optionshouse.com> <519D0921.9080807@2ndQuadrant.com> <519D174A.4050703@commandprompt.com> <519D1CD6.2080607@2ndQuadrant.com> <519D2562.2060604@2ndQuadrant.com> <519D49DC.7060406@commandprompt.com> In-Reply-To: <519D49DC.7060406@commandprompt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:enLX9UslM8CBfxGAR6UbqRHq/kwQSL2XFL/pqML72Re 5VkI2Ou2beoHWmqEOnfld8Z/t03rJWQpM3rqAejwmjI859gAUS aMrnIirntALfPWRssoKdpFm2KiW8/4Mie7VSYLIj7XLOfkOkVF 5d0P6TjSLY/lS1QOfDIC5aFBC0WnXWAB8zwtSKRnq3f0RG9dBx EETo4h2lmvhDeMHB490w5pJn26eOa3/mZQmx1z3cDNxK+o9VYy +N2Z+bIsv19wzNa1avWTfQShAZMtiw8BzGUKK8LNdMvdlfGbf8 2iaIwLxREqepX5Yr4pcKuWFAnJ1Q/2EVfstg/SSKDH7uPSTmYb LKOUoU2PbeTnRjhVpQDM= X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-performance Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org On 5/22/13 6:42 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > I am curious how the 710 or S3700 stacks up against the new M500 from > Crucial? I know Intel is kind of the goto for these things but the m500 > is power off protected and rated at: Endurance: 72TB total bytes written > (TBW), equal to 40GB per day for 5 years . The M500 is fine on paper, I had that one on my list of things to evaluate when I can. The general reliability of Crucial's consumer SSD has looked good recently. I'm not going to recommend that one until I actually see one work as expected though. I'm waiting for one to pass by or I reach a new toy purchasing spree. What makes me step very carefully here is watching what Intel went through when they released their first supercap drive, the 320 series. If you look at the nastiest of the firmware bugs they had, like the infamous "8MB bug", a lot of them were related to the new clean shutdown feature. It's the type of firmware that takes some exposure to the real world to flush out the bugs. The last of the enthusiast SSD players who tried to take this job on was OCZ with the Vertex 3 Pro, and they never got that model quite right before abandoning it altogether. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance