Subject: Re: pg_upgrade 10.2
To: Murthy Nunna <mnunna@fnal.gov>,
 "pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>,
 "pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org>,
 "pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org"
 <pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org>
References: 
 <DM5PR09MB15157D85EB291E8F7EA62E25B87F0@DM5PR09MB1515.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
 <1a3ebd40-7870-3eab-97d4-ca2b9907d917@aklaver.com>
 <DM5PR09MB151597B492B84C4E7FC8E099B87F0@DM5PR09MB1515.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
 <5f0d7335-e681-56bb-7d14-cf97fccb1bcf@aklaver.com>
 <DM5PR09MB15156F523C5E066175669CB1B87F0@DM5PR09MB1515.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
 <4b66fd13-951c-fab6-a618-d27860ba465b@aklaver.com>
 <DM5PR09MB151575804C46BE5FCE21E5F3B87F0@DM5PR09MB1515.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
From: Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
Message-ID: <523a2043-c269-4bb0-6859-a73f3fc7ad41@aklaver.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 16:50:43 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <DM5PR09MB151575804C46BE5FCE21E5F3B87F0@DM5PR09MB1515.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 06/12/2018 02:49 PM, Murthy Nunna wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
> 
> Port numbers are correct.
> 
> I moved the position of -c (-p 5433 -P 5434 -c -r -v). Now it is NOT complaining about old cluster running. However, I am running into a different problem.
> 
> New cluster database "ifb_prd_last" is not empty
> Failure, exiting
> 
> Note: ifb_prd_last is not new cluster. It is actually old cluster.
> 
> Is this possibly because in one of my earlier attempts where I shutdown old cluster and ran pg_upgrade with -c at the end of the command line. I think -c was ignored and my cluster has been upgraded in that attempt. Is that possible?

I don't so because it exited before it got the upgrading part.


-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com