Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VlKc6-0000RP-Eb for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:31:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VlKc5-0004HX-V0 for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:31:46 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:7903:4::125]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VlKc5-0004HR-2d for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:31:45 +0000 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::197]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VlKc2-0004Cr-2r for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:31:44 +0000 Received: from mfilter2-d.gandi.net (mfilter2-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.140]) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D74FE41C091; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 16:31:38 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter2-d.gandi.net Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]) by mfilter2-d.gandi.net (mfilter2-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zUUjoCXicDC9; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 16:31:37 +0100 (CET) X-Originating-IP: 98.27.58.255 Received: from [192.168.10.146] (cpe-098-027-058-255.nc.res.rr.com [98.27.58.255]) (Authenticated sender: adsend@dunslane.net) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C11E341C074; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 16:31:35 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5294BED4.7080409@dunslane.net> Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 10:31:32 -0500 From: Andrew Dunstan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Craig James CC: "pgsql-performance@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Postgresql in a Virtual Machine References: <5293B0B9.1060200@vmware.com> <5294A77F.8050508@cybertec.at> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-performance Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org On 11/26/2013 09:26 AM, Craig James wrote: > > On 25.11.2013 22:01, Lee Nguyen wrote: > > > Why shouldn't we run Postgres in a VM? What are the > downsides? Does anyone > have any metrics or benchmarks with the latest Postgres? > > > For those of us with small (a few to a dozen servers), we'd like to > get out of server maintenance completely. Can anyone with experience > on a cloud VM solution comment? Do the VM solutions provided by the > major hosting companies have the same good performance as the VM's > that that several have described here? > > Obviously there's Amazon's new Postgres solution available. What else > is out there in the way of "instant on" solutions with > Linux/Postgres/Apache preconfigured systems? Has anyone used them in > production? > > If you want a full stack including Postgres, Heroku might be your best bet. Depends a bit on your application and your workload. And yes, I've used it. Full disclosure: I have done work paid for by Heroku. cheers andrew -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance