Message-ID: <53F5C39B.30906@catalyst.net.nz>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 22:02:03 +1200
From: Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
CC: "Graeme B. Bell" <grb@skogoglandskap.no>
Subject: Re: Turn off Hyperthreading! WAS: 60 core performance with
 9.3
References: <53ACB190.2030206@catalyst.net.nz>
 <WM!d3faee1472c3c4b0fa7a14ce4fee2175ef92f1e0d7e7edb62fe3bcc6fa7e486c99870994a65fa43cc61df990ae549575!@asav-2.01.com>
 <53ECFD75.3060408@agliodbs.com> <53ED371D.109@catalyst.net.nz>
 <WM!14a45a34c8080927967621cff2751e173aba58b17a2748a7a628c8fd3be56f3c9596f20e774ed5df15c6863316278466!@asav-2.01.com>
 <53F4F36E.6050003@agliodbs.com> <53F52BE6.6080006@catalyst.net.nz>
In-Reply-To: <53F52BE6.6080006@catalyst.net.nz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org

On 21/08/14 11:14, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>
> You didn't mention what
> cpu this is for (or how many sockets etc), would be useful to know.
>

Just to clarify - while you mentioned that the production system was 40 
cores, it wasn't immediately obvious that the same system was the source 
of the measurements you posted...sorry if I'm being a mixture of 
pedantic and dense - just trying to make sure it is clear what 
systems/cpus etc we are talking about (with this in mind it never hurts 
to quote cpu and mobo model numbers)!

Cheers

Mark


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance