Received: from magus.postgresql.org (magus.postgresql.org [87.238.57.229])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECEB5841FF3
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:52:40 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) id 1SNA8c-0008Me-VO
	for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 21:52:40 +0000
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q3PLq97b005453;
	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:52:09 -0400 (EDT)
To: Venki Ramachandran <venki_ramachandran@yahoo.com>
cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>,
	Samuel Gendler <sgendler@ideasculptor.com>,
	"pgsql-performance@postgresql.org" <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Parallel Scaling of a pgplsql problem 
In-reply-to: <1335390338.10325.YahooMailNeo@web184505.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> 
References: <1335379923.47084.YahooMailNeo@web184514.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
	<CAEV0TzAVQXf42n9vXu26JAe0-eQ9AgwwAErYFn0HMm8ScQaodA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1335388323.84458.YahooMailNeo@web184517.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
	<CAFj8pRB7gvUocfW5Uv5-NVFtRPSE97AS6Sbk5gzrdMweCpNS_Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<1335390338.10325.YahooMailNeo@web184505.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Venki Ramachandran <venki_ramachandran@yahoo.com>
	message dated "Wed, 25 Apr 2012 14:45:38 -0700"
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:52:08 -0400
Message-ID: <5452.1335390728@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-Archive-Number: 201204/151
X-Sequence-Number: 46797

Venki Ramachandran <venki_ramachandran@yahoo.com> writes:
> Replacing current_timestamp() with transaction_timestamp() and statement_timestamp() did not help!!!. 

You did not read the documentation you were pointed to.  Use
clock_timestamp().

			regards, tom lane