Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XyyqR-00019b-Mr for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 08:11:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XyyqR-00012v-7D for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 08:11:31 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XyyqP-00012h-12 for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 08:11:29 +0000 Received: from ms.mbigroup.it ([84.233.239.90]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XyyqL-00058K-4e for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 08:11:27 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ms.mbigroup.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4B3E1C126F; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:11:21 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ms.mbigroup.it Received: from ms.mbigroup.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ms.mbigroup.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iCIC_QuRKvjg; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:11:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailserver0.bo.mbigroup.it (mailserver1.bo.mbigroup.it [192.168.10.31]) by ms.mbigroup.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 099C81C126D; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:11:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailserver0.bo.mbigroup.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B9D82C14BB; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:11:21 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mbigroup.it Received: from mailserver0.bo.mbigroup.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailserver1.bo.mbigroup.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DWZr2f0TtLN5; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:11:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.27.201] (unknown [192.168.27.201]) by mailserver0.bo.mbigroup.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA9A2C14BA; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:11:20 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <548951A7.6090407@mbigroup.it> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:11:19 +0100 From: Maila Fatticcioni Reply-To: mfatticcioni@mbigroup.it Organization: MBI S.r.l. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patrick Krecker CC: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Tuning the configuration References: <548823F8.4070003@mbigroup.it> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-performance Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/10/2014 06:47 PM, Patrick Krecker wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:44 AM, Maila Fatticcioni > wrote: Hello. I need to tune a postgres > installation I've just made to get a better performance. I use two > identical servers with a hot replication configuration. The two > servers have the following hardware: > > Dual Processor Intel Xeon E5-2640V2 20Mb cache 2.00Ghz, Ram Mem. > 32Gb DDR-3 Ecc Registered, Controller MegaRaid 8-ports 1Gb cache, 4 > Enterprise Hdd NL Sas 600 4Tb Sata, 2 Samsung SSD 840 Pro Series > 512Gb, 2 Hdd 500 Gb > > I made a software raid with the last two hard disks with ext4 and > I installed Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS (I have to use this SO) on it. I > made a hardware raid with the four SAS hard disks and I mount the > partition on it with ext4 without journaling and I put the database > on it. > > Now I have two more steps to do. > > 1- could you please help tuning the configuration? What are the > best value I should use for wal_buffers and shared_buffers? 2- I > would like to use the two SDD to store the wal file. Do you think > it is useful or how should I use them? > > Thank you for your answers. > > Best Regards, Maila Fatticcioni >> >> >> -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list >> (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your >> subscription: >> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance > > We used [1] to great effect when setting our server up. We have > not had to diverge much from the recommendations in that document. > > Generally, the specifics of tuning depend on the workload of your > specific instance. > > [1] https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Tuning_Your_PostgreSQL_Server > Hello. Indeed I followed this document to set up my configuration. I am glad that you recommend this as well. Eventually I use this setup: max_connections = 150 shared_buffers = 8GB work_mem = 32MB checkpoint_segments = 128 checkpoint_completion_target = 0.9 Best Regards, Maila Fatticcioni -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlSJUaEACgkQi2q3wPb3FcPsuQCeLR5P49d60anErETNiX0iHNLe Eu4An0QN3nzr/kvlPUTm9Q1A0GkjB/gw =kdGU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance