Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YKvta-0005iU-4I for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 21:29:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YKvtZ-0001au-Ik for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 21:29:29 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YKvtY-0001YO-4s for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 21:29:28 +0000 Received: from mbx.knossos.net.nz ([202.160.48.10]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YKvtN-0004Wx-Do for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 21:29:26 +0000 Received: from [10.1.1.3] (121-99-179-57.bng1.nct.orcon.net.nz [121.99.179.57]) (authenticated bits=0) by mbx.knossos.net.nz (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t19LT0Yn001880 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:29:01 +1300 Message-ID: <54D9269C.9080808@archidevsys.co.nz> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:29:00 +1300 From: Gavin Flower Organization: ArchiDevSys User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Survey: Max TPS you've ever seen References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-performance Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org On 10/02/15 08:30, Luis Antonio Dias de Sá Junior wrote: > Hi, > > A survay: with pgbench using TPS-B, what is the maximum TPS you're > ever seen? > > For me: 12000 TPS. > > -- > Luis Antonio Dias de Sá Junior Important to specify: 1. O/S 2. version of PostgreSQL 3. PostgreSQL configuration 4. hardware configuration 5. anything else that might affect performance I suspect that Linux will out perform Microsoft on the same hardware, and optimum configuration for both O/S's... Cheers, Gavin -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance