Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZC9Wb-0005U8-Ku for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 16:45:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZC9Wb-0000NN-5J for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 16:45:45 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZC9WZ-0000Mz-Ox for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 16:45:43 +0000 Received: from 01.zmailcloud.com ([192.198.85.104] helo=mx-out-1.zmailcloud.com) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZC9WW-0003Tc-5C for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 16:45:43 +0000 Received: from smtp.01.com (smtp.01.com [10.10.0.43]) by mx-out-1.zmailcloud.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EB0656416F; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 11:45:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-out-1.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 156DEA038F; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 11:45:36 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp-out-1.01.com Received: from smtp.01.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp-out-1.01.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P40FFFI_P-TY; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 11:45:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: from smtp.01.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-out-1.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9363A038E; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 11:45:35 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-out-1.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF9D8A0392; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 11:45:35 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp-out-1.01.com Received: from smtp.01.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp-out-1.01.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id QNpxZCPp8GtU; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 11:45:35 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [172.47.23.103] (50-0-190-244.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.0.190.244]) by smtp-out-1.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A00D5A038F; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 11:45:34 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <559AB0AD.1060509@agliodbs.com> Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 09:45:33 -0700 From: Josh Berkus Organization: PostgreSQL Experts Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Mkrtchyan, Tigran" , Tom Lane CC: Andres Freund , pgsql-performance Subject: Re: 9.5alpha1 vs 9.4 References: <1897514812.2949286.1436094651680.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de> <20150705125403.GD24494@alap3.anarazel.de> <10845.1436106805@sss.pgh.pa.us> <63195233.2993923.1436116584403.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-performance Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org On 07/05/2015 10:16 AM, Mkrtchyan, Tigran wrote: > Thanks for the hin. My bad. The backup db and 9.5 had a different type on > one of the foreign-key constrains char(36) vs varchar(36). > > The schema was screwed couple of days ago, byt performance numbers I checked only > after migration to 9.5. Thank you for testing! Can you re-run your tests with the fixed schema? How does it look? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance