Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aYVKL-000363-AO for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 09:01:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aYVKK-0003ne-63 for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 09:01:44 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aYVKJ-0003nT-Jp for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 09:01:43 +0000 Received: from blog.elster.de ([217.6.110.187] helo=elster.de) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aYVKD-00060m-3f for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 09:01:42 +0000 Received: from edmzarafa01.een.elster.de ([10.1.20.13]:36642) by elster.de with [XMail 1.27 ESMTP Server] id for from ; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:01:35 +0100 Received: from [10.200.128.23] (enmfwa02ext.een.elster.de [192.168.90.2]) by edmzarafa01.een.elster.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 18FDE2D6035D for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:01:35 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Cloud versus buying my own iron To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org References: From: "Gunnar \"Nick\" Bluth" X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56CD716A.4090402@elster.de> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:01:30 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-performance Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org Am 24.02.2016 um 06:06 schrieb Craig James: > At some point in the next year we're going to reconsider our hosting > environment, currently consisting of several medium-sized servers (2x4 > CPUs, 48GB RAM, 12-disk RAID system with 8 in RAID 10 and 2 in RAID 1 > for WAL). We use barman to keep a hot standby and an archive. > > The last time we dug into this, we were initially excited, but our > excitement turned to disappointment when we calculated the real costs of > hosted services, and the constraints on performance and customizability. > > Due to the nature of our business, we need a system where we can install > plug-ins to Postgres. I expect that alone will limit our choices. In > addition to our Postgres database, we run a fairly ordinary Apache web site. > > There is constant chatter in this group about buying servers vs. the > various hosted services. Does anyone have any sort of summary comparison > of the various solutions out there? Or is it just a matter of > researching it myself and maybe doing some benchmarking and price > comparisons? For starters, did you see Josh Berkus' presentation on the topic? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WV5P2DgxPoI I for myself would probably always go the "own iron" road, but alas! that's just the way I feel about control. And I'm kind of a Linux oldshot, so managing a (hosted root) server doesn't scare me off. OTOH, I do see the advantages of having things like monitoring, backup, HDD replacements etc. done for you. Which is essentially what you pay for. In essence, there's obviously no silver bullet ;-) Best regards, -- Gunnar "Nick" Bluth DBA ELSTER Tel: +49 911/991-4665 Mobil: +49 172/8853339 -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance