public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Andrei Lepikhov <[email protected]>
To: Attila Soki <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: unstable query plan on pg 16,17,18
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 21:25:31 +0100
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
On 23/2/26 18:03, Attila Soki wrote:
>> On 23 Feb 2026, at 16:54, Andrei Lepikhov <[email protected]> wrote:
> see my previous answer:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1695A676-062B-47C5-
> B302-91E2357DC874%40gmx.net <https://www.postgresql.org/message-
> id/1695A676-062B-47C5-B302-91E2357DC874%40gmx.net>
>
> but here are the plans again:
> In order to be able to publish the plans here, I have obfuscated the
> table and field names, but this is reversible, so I can provide more
> info if needed.
>
> plan-ok:
> https://explain.depesz.com/s/hQvM <https://explain.depesz.com/s/hQvM;
>
> plan-wrong:
> https://explain.depesz.com/s/uLvl <https://explain.depesz.com/s/uLvl;
Thanks. But I meant your 'good' plan built by the PG14. I think a new
feature invented later has added some problems.
Current conjecture is the following. As I see, the main problem is with
Right Hash Join:
-> Hash Right Join (cost=210369.25..210370.30 rows=8 width=99)
Its inner side (Hash table) is rebuilt multiple times (around 1k) due to
an external parameter (gauf_1.id) in the subtree. It looks like a
disaster, and before I thought we don't build hash tables over
parameterised query trees at all.
So, let me discover a little more, but your PG14 explain could add more
details here.
--
regards, Andrei Lepikhov,
pgEdge
view thread (25+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: unstable query plan on pg 16,17,18
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox