Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2B971337B48 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:09:51 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16156-07 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:09:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 00:19:32.391362 by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from serv01.siteground178.com (ns1.siteground178.com [67.15.255.19]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FEBB1336FA7 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:09:44 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [67.15.255.19] (port=59012 helo=intermodalsoftwaresolutions.net) by serv01.siteground178.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P0gBg-0001Kz-Px; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:50:04 -0500 Received: from phpmailer ([76.106.243.62]) by intermodalsoftwaresolutions.net with HTTP (PHPMailer); Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:50:04 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:50:04 -0500 To: Tory M Blue , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org From: Michael Gould Subject: Re: Running 9 in production? Sticking with 8.4.4 for a while? Message-ID: <6d73cd23bff95515c4a7eb9a2a2881eb@intermodalsoftwaresolutions.net> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: PHPMailer [version 1.71] X-Mailer: FeLaMiMail In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - serv01.siteground178.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - postgresql.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - intermodalsoftwaresolutions.net X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201009/197 X-Sequence-Number: 40400 Tory, We will continue to test under 9.0 but will keep production at 8.4.4 for a while longer as we want to see what kinds of issues show up over the next few weeks with 9.0. 9.0 has some features we would like to use but it = isn't worth the risk of production. I think that the PostGres team has one of = the best develop and test cycle management systems but there is always things that are going to pop up after a release. It just depends on the level of pain your willing to suffer. It seems that the developers are able to = track down and kill bugs in a timely manner so I would expect to see a 9.0.1 version in the near future. At that point we'll start doing a lot more = tire kicking. Best Regards Mike Gould "Tory M Blue" wrote: > I'm doing an OS upgrade and have been sitting on 8.4.3 for sometime. I > was wondering if it's better for the short term just to bring things > to 8.4.4 and let 9.0 bake a bit longer, or are people with large data > sets running 9.0 in production already? >=20 > Just looking for 9.0 feedback (understand it's still quite new). >=20 > Thanks > Tory >=20 > --=20 > Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list = (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance >=20 -- Michael Gould, Managing Partner Intermodal Software Solutions, LLC 904.226.0978 904.592.5250 fax