Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BCB8650164 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 11:58:03 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30029-04 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 11:57:54 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3054B6500F9 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 11:57:59 -0300 (ADT) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c7so817408nfi.23 for ; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 07:57:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=iU8Ny4VTibc75L/g8WHg+ZpH8/WXuOjE61fFHFZ2d/4=; b=PxcHL6yZzg2OseplVmhidRbVlwMIwhGIjjwvDS00ogZhSNtBvZreHURnNt2XSPwg/M aNwcvrK2LZYCg9A5aRCtZz3dMKuZi3QpyS0VqIfChS3p4lfU8WzwlsdQtwUG2xvZBKbK O50j6xQI1biec7EIiUpAm+2QSg4OXtQRDMmVM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=Zq1fUhZzFc0g1gaaHB9tZ8flxPbGR7JW/UkvI1fKkME4xpAXgfWaUzZ7rbm6jS8ZjS 0woitnV3GxRnznRFeijVTlBXq8LNKSynYHkYoo1vSL82H5wdNHsuGMUVfMpOeYrRWeZp Ym5j/ChRJ/n/2o543MRE04bABPm5FFfuwG1oY= Received: by 10.210.58.17 with SMTP id g17mr1076046eba.108.1217948278231; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 07:57:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.210.72.10 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 07:57:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <70c01d1d0808050757j34886207xbcbb76d475319b65@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 07:57:58 -0700 From: "Mark Wong" To: david@lang.hm Subject: Re: file system and raid performance Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, "Gabrielle Roth" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <70c01d1d0808042154u7b78d988vac1e461a93b0ba10@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200808/10 X-Sequence-Number: 30891 On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:04 PM, wrote: > On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, Mark Wong wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> We've thrown together some results from simple i/o tests on Linux >> comparing various file systems, hardware and software raid with a >> little bit of volume management: >> >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/HP_ProLiant_DL380_G5_Tuning_Guide >> >> What I'd like to ask of the folks on the list is how relevant is this >> information in helping make decisions such as "What file system should >> I use?" "What performance can I expect from this RAID configuration?" >> I know these kind of tests won't help answer questions like "Which >> file system is most reliable?" but we would like to be as helpful as >> we can. >> >> Any suggestions/comments/criticisms for what would be more relevant or >> interesting also appreciated. We've started with Linux but we'd also >> like to hit some other OS's. I'm assuming FreeBSD would be the other >> popular choice for the DL-380 that we're using. >> >> I hope this is helpful. > > it's definantly timely for me (we were having a spirited 'discussion' on > this topic at work today ;-) > > what happened with XFS? Not exactly sure, I didn't attempt to debug much. I only looked into it enough to see that the fio processes were waiting for something. In one case I left the test go for 24 hours too see if it would stop. Note that I specified to fio not to run longer than an hour. > you show it as not completing half the tests in the single-disk table and > it's completly missing from the other ones. > > what OS/kernel were you running? This is a Gentoo system, running the 2.6.25-gentoo-r6 kernel. > if it was linux, which software raid did you try (md or dm) did you use lvm > or raw partitions? We tried mdraid, not device-mapper. So far we have only used raw partitions (whole devices without partitions.) Regards, Mark