Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XUdMe-0005IZ-9h for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 15:11:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XUdMd-0006lL-H2 for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 15:11:19 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XUdKq-0006g2-UM for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 15:09:28 +0000 Received: from smtp-o-3.desy.de ([2001:638:700:1038::1:9c]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XUdKj-0000XX-N0 for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 15:09:27 +0000 Received: from smtp-map-3.desy.de (smtp-map-3.desy.de [131.169.56.68]) by smtp-o-3.desy.de (DESY-O-3) with ESMTP id A83622805C6 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:09:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ZITSWEEP2.win.desy.de (zitsweep2.win.desy.de [131.169.97.96]) by smtp-map-3.desy.de (DESY_MAP_3) with ESMTP id 97533110E for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:09:20 +0200 (MEST) Received: from smtp-intra-1.desy.de (lb-40-26.desy.de) by ZITSWEEP2.win.desy.de (Clearswift SMTPRS 5.5.0) with ESMTP id ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:09:20 +0200 Received: from z-mta-2.desy.de (z-mta-2.desy.de [131.169.55.136]) by smtp-intra-1.desy.de (DESY-INTRA-1) with ESMTP id 7AE713E905; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:09:20 +0200 (MEST) Received: from z-mta-2.desy.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z-mta-2.desy.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75E892600B8; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:09:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from z-mta-2.desy.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z-mta-2.desy.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684C02600C4; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:09:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from z-mbx-2.desy.de (z-mbx-2.desy.de [131.169.55.140]) by z-mta-2.desy.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D352600B8; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:09:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:09:20 +0200 (CEST) From: "Mkrtchyan, Tigran" To: Jeff Janes Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Message-ID: <747323809.44735.1411052960344.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de> In-Reply-To: References: <45142416.42827.1411033201079.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de> <88549888.42916.1411034301200.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de> Subject: Re: postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.0.7_GA_6021 (ZimbraWebClient - FF31 (Linux)/8.0.7_GA_6021) Thread-Topic: postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4 Thread-Index: lW0qAtsPwJXEHvjzSG3qkQamGbYrhg== X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-performance Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jeff Janes" > To: "Tigran Mkrtchyan" > Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 4:56:22 PM > Subject: Re: [PERFORM] postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4 > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Mkrtchyan, Tigran > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Folk, > > > > I am trying to investigate some performance issues which we have with > > postgres > > (a different topic by itself) and tried postgres.9.4beta2, with a hope > > that it > > perform better. > > > > Turned out that 9.4 is 2x slower than 9.3.5 on the same hardware. > > > > Some technical details: > > > > Host: rhel 6.5 2.6.32-431.23.3.el6.x86_64 > > 256 GB RAM, 40 cores, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v2 @ 2.20GHz > > 2x160GB PCIe SSD DELL_P320h-MTFDGAL175SAH ( on one 9.3, on an other one > > 9.4 ) > > > > Why are the versions segregated that way? Are you sure they are configured > identically? es, they are configured identically > > > > > > postgres tweaks: > > > > > > default_statistics_target = 100 > > wal_writer_delay = 10s > > vacuum_cost_delay = 50 > > synchronous_commit = off > > > > Are you sure that synchronous_commit is actually off on the 9.4 instance? yes, synchronous_commit is off. > > 9.3.5: > > > > # /usr/pgsql-9.3/bin/pgbench -r -j 1 -c 1 -T 60 > > > > ... > > > > 0.035940 END; > > > > > > 9.4beta2: > > > ... > > > 0.957854 END; > > > > Looks like IO. Postgres internal IO? May be. We get 600MB/s on this SSDs. Tigran. > > Cheers, > > Jeff > -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance