Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F7764FCF8 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:29:11 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19492-07 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:29:11 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98AC964FC77 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:29:10 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id mAAGT5Hi007711; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:29:05 -0500 (EST) To: "Andrus" cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Simple indexed IN query takes 40 seconds In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to "Andrus" message dated "Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:25:00 +0200" Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:29:05 -0500 Message-ID: <7709.1226334545@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Archive-Number: 200811/60 X-Sequence-Number: 31791 "Andrus" writes: > How to make this query to run fast ? Using something newer than 8.1 would help. regards, tom lane