Message-ID: <7847377f86ea938f4dec068e43eb77a6d0bfc520.camel@cybertec.at>
Subject: Re: proposal: schema variables
From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, Marcos Pegoraro
 <marcos@f10.com.br>,  Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, jian he
 <jian.universality@gmail.com>, Dmitry Dolgov	 <9erthalion6@gmail.com>, Erik
 Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>, Michael Paquier	 <michael@paquier.xyz>, Amit Kapila
 <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, DUVAL REMI	 <REMI.DUVAL@cheops.fr>, PostgreSQL
 Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 08:27:13 +0200
In-Reply-To: <aCzu84eWXnXPvFmf@momjian.us>
References: 
	<CAFj8pRArtw+Qqzk+Zf2NxjgO=paCBdc54eEma+MsVwtx3j7Atg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAFj8pRAK_8ym1J=SAdin-vtL0PAachXgjWgU3QrhzinRdBX2sw@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAFj8pRAx-Gb9Ux825cxGNm38qQUOrij1GY6erPRaQ=cpqfiX7g@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAFj8pRCEjG005L=1vGbir-odYdcYxByOAeFVJ_K9eRcRF=MbNQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <aCyYHXhAjXOUPvLO@momjian.us>
	 <CAB-JLwY2-Hm_SYbj2td_VKuU8awCwgDr-sOtjHRE2C-Sgg_pFg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <aCywNzDx2J3jrY1-@momjian.us>
	 <41D2EE98-224D-4B43-9F8B-127525A99CD7@yesql.se>
	 <aCzl0SQYGTBJfdtY@momjian.us>
	 <138d50cd8d9617469922eb0017956a3610089064.camel@cybertec.at>
	 <aCzu84eWXnXPvFmf@momjian.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.56.1 (3.56.1-1.fc42) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7847377f86ea938f4dec068e43eb77a6d0bfc520.camel%40cybertec.at>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 2025-05-20 at 17:06 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> f no committer intends to pick it up and commit it, I think the proper
> > action would be to step up and reject the patch set, not complain about=
 the
> > insistence of the author.
>=20
> Are you saying I should not complain until we have officially rejected
> the patch set?=C2=A0 If we officially reject it, the patch author would n=
o
> longer post it?

No, you are free to complain, just as Pavel is free to keep his patch
set from rotting.  What I am trying to say is that rejecting the patch
set is the most effective way to complain.

The current state is that Pavel keeps the patch set alive, and occasionally
people review it or parts of it.  But no committer is accepting or rejectin=
g
it, so the patch set remains in limbo.  This annoys you, and it is certainl=
y
not a happy experience for the author.  Rejection is not nice, but at least
it would make it easier for Pavel to move on and spend his energy elsewhere=
.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe