X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 773289DD5F8 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 14:02:18 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52927-05 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 14:02:17 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B30369DD44E for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 14:02:15 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jB6I2C0m007984; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 13:02:12 -0500 (EST) To: Bruce Momjian cc: Oleg Bartunov , Michael Riess , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene In-reply-to: <200512061727.jB6HRVN18473@candle.pha.pa.us> References: <200512061727.jB6HRVN18473@candle.pha.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian message dated "Tue, 06 Dec 2005 12:27:31 -0500" Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 13:02:12 -0500 Message-ID: <7983.1133892132@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.002 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.002] X-Spam-Score: 0.002 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200512/177 X-Sequence-Number: 15998 Bruce Momjian writes: > Oleg Bartunov wrote: >> Tsearch2 integration into pgsql would be cool, but, I see no problem to >> use tsearch2 as an official extension module. > Agreed. There isn't anything magical about a plug-in vs something > integrated, as least in PostgreSQL. The quality gap between contrib and the main system is a lot smaller than it used to be, at least for those contrib modules that have regression tests. Main and contrib get equal levels of testing from the buildfarm, so they're about on par as far as portability goes. We could never say that before 8.1 ... (Having said that, I think that tsearch2 will eventually become part of core, but probably not for awhile yet.) regards, tom lane