Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A311337BB4 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:50:06 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44549-05 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:49:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mx01.bfk.de (mx01.bfk.de [193.227.124.2]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629241337B84 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:49:55 -0400 (AST) Received: from mx00.int.bfk.de ([10.119.110.2]) by mx01.bfk.de with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) id 1Pjwwr-0005OZ-VU; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:49:53 +0000 Received: by bfk.de with local id 1Pjwwr-0007XV-Sl; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:49:53 +0000 To: mladen.gogala@vmsinfo.com Cc: "pgsql-performance\@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Any experience using "shake" defragmenter? References: <4D45C607.4070101@vmsinfo.com> From: Florian Weimer Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:49:53 +0000 In-Reply-To: <4D45C607.4070101@vmsinfo.com> (Mladen Gogala's message of "Sun\, 30 Jan 2011 15\:11\:51 -0500") Message-ID: <82ei7t81ce.fsf@mid.bfk.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201101/344 X-Sequence-Number: 42131 * Mladen Gogala: > Did anyone try using "shake" while the cluster is active? As far as I can tell, it's totally unsafe. --=20 Florian Weimer BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstra=DFe 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99