X-Original-To: pgsql-general-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 865B39DC81E for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 13:58:30 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 62408-05 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 13:58:24 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A397B9DC819 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 13:58:22 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jBDHwMqv008386; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:58:22 -0500 (EST) To: johnsw@wardbrook.com cc: "pgsql general" Subject: Re: Memory Leakage Problem In-reply-to: <6597.195.152.219.3.1134491862.squirrel@mercury.wardbrook.com> References: <1133891282.11803.7.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> <1133991204.11803.43.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> <6353.1134016733@sss.pgh.pa.us> <439DDB49.3000905@freedomhealthcare.org> <439E7B7A.9080205@wardbrook.com> <3666.1134460063@sss.pgh.pa.us> <439E80B1.8030800@wardbrook.com> <6375.1134486792@sss.pgh.pa.us> <6597.195.152.219.3.1134491862.squirrel@mercury.wardbrook.com> Comments: In-reply-to "John Sidney-Woollett" message dated "Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:37:42 +0000" Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:58:22 -0500 Message-ID: <8385.1134496702@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.003 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.003] X-Spam-Score: 0.003 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200512/655 X-Sequence-Number: 88218 "John Sidney-Woollett" writes: > Is it possible to grab memory outsize of a processes space? Not unless there's a kernel bug involved. regards, tom lane