Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183])
	by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B561C2E003A
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@developer.postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:33:05 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 13928-02
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@developer.postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:33:02 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C392E005C
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:33:02 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m3PLWxEd000866;
	Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:33:00 -0400 (EDT)
To: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>,
	pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix
	TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId() to use binary search
In-reply-to: <200804251724.48705.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> 
References: <20080317021856.0D2D37558DC@cvs.postgresql.org>
	<200804211229.00871.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
	<20080421165424.GC14464@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<200804251724.48705.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Comments: In-reply-to Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
	message dated "Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:24:47 -0400"
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:32:59 -0400
Message-ID: <865.1209159179@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200804/368
X-Sequence-Number: 29861

Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> Oddly some dtrace profiling gave me this, which is pretty different, but 
> certainly doesn't have concerns about TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId

... which seems to pretty much destroy your thesis, no?

			regards, tom lane