Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.204.183])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79953798DD1
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:11:34 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 11972-03
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:11:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-qy0-f185.google.com (mail-qy0-f185.google.com
	[209.85.221.185])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C717984CD
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:11:23 -0300 (ADT)
Received: by qyk15 with SMTP id 15so580523qyk.10
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version
	:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding
	:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
	bh=GnIwSfz35ozUUz0tqu5pgGUaSIF7qZ+sSv4JCna/KHA=;
	b=f5IGOFNzMDC8xqsEXqE4l46mnVpDEGV61QD6u9zbbJU3KLDGqCu9p6NQacuKG0Spd8
	+kwxRn8/9cmanJ0Of1xCYOq19ULozrfIPrOSlADhXNoOh89a6Y9pqeL32D3Qbz96yUXg
	00IEJRoqB2hP8FvTsxJyt9TTiUCZPNs/geO1g=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
	:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
	b=UMckJb0wsu/8GHdiUkpSF7R+G22IQwk0rv1Bm8EW3vKM2eABTWQ5mpqPuIQPpYb/0h
	U2qfEttemPgj8mg49kn12rBkje4i8ok7/AIS9+92JU30x+6qcCW6+YXec99Ygp3tA0HQ
	YAKLQVGiXvAG+WlS0jkkugjRuUcCN1DkwBDmo=
Received: by 10.224.115.83 with SMTP id h19mr251062qaq.100.1268831481669;
	Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:11:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from h141.cmh.bplglobal.net (rrcs-74-219-149-162.central.biz.rr.com
	[74.219.149.162])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id be13sm1835339ibb.9.2010.03.17.06.11.17
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
	Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Testing FusionIO
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Justin Pitts <justinpitts@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1268831008.4412.1736.camel@bnicholson-desktop>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:11:15 -0400
Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Devrim_G=DCND=DCZ?= <devrim@gunduz.org>,
	Ben Chobot <bench@silentmedia.com>,
	PostgreSQL - Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <86675EB2-8CC8-4159-91DD-27BB5E6AC1C3@gmail.com>
References: <1268059301.2098.87.camel@hp-laptop2.gunduz.org>
	<0A41C50D-3F29-4021-A959-95AF955D570F@silentmedia.com>
	<1268829058.2137.31.camel@hp-laptop2.gunduz.org>
	<1268831008.4412.1736.camel@bnicholson-desktop>
To: Brad Nicholson <bnichols@ca.afilias.info>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.599 tagged_above=-10 required=5
	tests=BAYES_00=-2.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201003/207
X-Sequence-Number: 38032

On Mar 17, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Brad Nicholson wrote:

> I've been hearing bad things from some folks about the quality of the
> FusionIO drives from a durability standpoint.

Can you be more specific about that? Durability over what time frame? =
How many devices in the sample set? How did FusionIO deal with the =
issue?=