Received: from localhost (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ECA59FBE06 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:18:41 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 84266-08 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:18:26 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from oxford.xeocode.com (unknown [62.232.55.118]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC6699FBDCD for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:18:32 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=oxford.xeocode.com) by oxford.xeocode.com with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IApkr-0005Dq-3Z; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:18:29 +0100 From: Gregory Stark To: "Marc Mamin" Cc: Subject: Re: Postgres configuration for 64 CPUs, 128 GB RAM... In-Reply-To: (Marc Mamin's message of "Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:10:30 +0200") Organization: EnterpriseDB References: X-Draft-From: ("nnimap+mail01.enterprisedb.com:INBOX.performance" 1565) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:18:28 +0100 Message-ID: <877iozrokr.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200707/185 X-Sequence-Number: 25869 "Marc Mamin" writes: > We have the oppotunity to benchmark our application on a large server. I > have to prepare the Postgres configuration and I'd appreciate some > comments on it as I am not experienced with servers of such a scale. > Moreover the configuration should be fail-proof as I won't be able to > attend the tests. I really think that's a recipe for disaster. Even on a regular machine you need to treat tuning as an on-going feedback process. There's no such thing as a fail-proof configuration since every application is different. On an exotic machine like this you're going to run into unique problems that nobody here can anticipate with certainty. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com