Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E6F9633A4E for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 23:51:09 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21215-06-4 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 02:50:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from news.hub.org (news.hub.org [200.46.204.72]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC5AD6333DE for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 23:50:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: from news.hub.org (news.hub.org [200.46.204.72]) by news.hub.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o752o8G5003813 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 23:50:25 -0300 (ADT) (envelope-from news@news.hub.org) Received: (from news@localhost) by news.hub.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o73H870V032960 for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 14:08:07 -0300 (ADT) (envelope-from news) From: Chris Browne X-Newsgroups: pgsql.performance Subject: Re: Testing Sandforce SSD Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 13:04:46 -0400 Organization: cbbrowne Computing Inc Lines: 38 Message-ID: <87k4o71vbl.fsf@cbbrowne.afilias-int.info> References: <4C4A9452.9070100@gmail.com> <4C4B1F84.5030306@2ndquadrant.com> <4C4B4B41.7000800@2ndquadrant.com> <1280005769.9866.69.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.hub.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:D0r5NAcYFhEWmTYYJPklNgloI8I= To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.011 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_20=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201008/67 X-Sequence-Number: 39910 jd@commandprompt.com ("Joshua D. Drake") writes: > On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 16:21 -0400, Greg Smith wrote: >> Greg Smith wrote: >> > Note that not all of the Sandforce drives include a capacitor; I hope >> > you got one that does! I wasn't aware any of the SF drives with a >> > capacitor on them were even shipping yet, all of the ones I'd seen >> > were the chipset that doesn't include one still. Haven't checked in a >> > few weeks though. >> >> Answer my own question here: the drive Yeb got was the brand spanking >> new OCZ Vertex 2 Pro, selling for $649 at Newegg for example: >> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820227535 and with >> the supercacitor listed right in the main production specifications >> there. This is officially the first inexpensive (relatively) SSD with a >> battery-backed write cache built into it. If Yeb's test results prove >> it works as it's supposed to under PostgreSQL, I'll be happy to finally >> have a moderately priced SSD I can recommend to people for database >> use. And I fear I'll be out of excuses to avoid buying one as a toy for >> my home system. > > That is quite the toy. I can get 4 SATA-II with RAID Controller, with > battery backed cache, for the same price or less :P Sure, but it: - Fits into a single slot - Is quiet - Consumes little power - Generates little heat - Is likely to be about as quick as the 4-drive array It doesn't have the extra 4TB of storage, but if you're building big-ish databases, metrics have to change anyways. This is a pretty slick answer for the small OLTP server. -- output = reverse("moc.liamg" "@" "enworbbc") http://linuxfinances.info/info/postgresql.html Chaotic Evil means never having to say you're sorry.