Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D6D72E00C8 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 02:29:08 -0300 (ADT) Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38455-02 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 02:29:02 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from oxford.xeocode.com (76-10-160-166.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.160.166]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 106162E0049 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 02:09:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=oxford.xeocode.com) by oxford.xeocode.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JpGBa-00083m-Fl; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 01:09:26 -0400 To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: , "Alvaro Herrera" Subject: Re: off-topic: SPAM In-Reply-To: (Marc G. Fournier's message of "Thu\, 24 Apr 2008 22\:09\:49 -0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-Draft-From: ("nnimap+mail01.enterprisedb.com:INBOX" 79758) References: <87lk338olw.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> <20080424103344.A41681@fserv.hub.org> <34b60eee0804240754j47c9a020y96e5e57dd28367d8@mail.gmail.com> <20080424134308.G41681@fserv.hub.org> <20080424165110.GB15631@alvh.no-ip.org> <87prsf6tbk.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> <20080424151704.I41681@fserv.hub.org> <20080424185405.B41681@fserv.hub.org> <87wsmm6flm.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> From: Gregory Stark Organization: EnterpriseDB Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 01:09:26 -0400 Message-ID: <87lk325xmh.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200804/275 X-Sequence-Number: 15023 "Marc G. Fournier" writes: > But, as I've said, if someone wants to write a good, well worded email, I have > no problem with doing a quick for loop to send out one message per user, maybe > with a counter in the subject line, and see what bounces back for those .br > addresses *shrug* As I said I was just going to send "Test message, please ignore" or something like that. Note that you need to put the individual subscriber in the To header. The worst problem with this amazingly brain-dead spam filter is that it doesn't give you back any other info about the original email aside from the From header and the To header. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's RemoteDBA services!