Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A8E64FD91 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:03:15 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 83180-02 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:03:11 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B9B64FDFB for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:03:11 -0300 (ADT) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c7so1140802nfi.23 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:03:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.210.133.2 with SMTP id g2mr353130ebd.61.1224032589910; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:03:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from oxford.xeocode.com.enterprisedb.com ([87.127.95.198]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g9sm15674694gvc.0.2008.10.14.18.03.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:03:08 -0700 (PDT) To: Martin Gainty Cc: Ang Chin Han , Scott Marlowe , Ivan Sergio Borgonovo , Subject: Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues? In-Reply-To: (Martin Gainty's message of "Tue\, 14 Oct 2008 10\:05\:36 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-Draft-From: ("nnimap+imap.gmail.com:PG" 91382) References: <2434A118-CEFA-43A9-BA88-006EC1F80326@hoegh.org> <200810122214.53558.uwe@oss4u.com> <20081013090228.248a665f@dawn.webthatworks.it> <20081014114011.0ebe495a@dawn.webthatworks.it> <8c8854360810140647n58abc9bend377e0e234dd39a9@mail.gmail.com> From: Gregory Stark Organization: EnterpriseDB Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 02:03:06 +0100 Message-ID: <87skqybrg5.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200810/588 X-Sequence-Number: 138837 Martin Gainty writes: > MG>comments prefixed with MG> Incidentally that's a good way to make sure people don't see your comments. There are a few variations but the common denominator is that things prefixed with "foo>" are quotations from earlier messages. Many mailers hide such comments or de-emphasize them to help the user concentrate on the new material. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's RemoteDBA services!