X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA209FA5BE for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 09:38:32 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 72869-01 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 09:38:28 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from floppy.pyrenet.fr (news.pyrenet.fr [194.116.145.2]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E5C9FA12F for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 09:38:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: by floppy.pyrenet.fr (Postfix, from userid 106) id 1CA773093C; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 14:38:26 +0200 (MET DST) From: Christopher Browne X-Newsgroups: pgsql.performance Subject: Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 08:23:42 -0400 Organization: cbbrowne Computing Inc Lines: 33 Message-ID: <87u06pz1kh.fsf@wolfe.cbbrowne.com> References: <1150151282.14661.42.camel@tigger> <54CA6A16-AB42-440D-B5DB-BC43AE283ED8@blighty.com> <448E11B1.20309@commandprompt.com> <31554317-AD3E-4D08-92DC-7958E46A0D47@neopolitan.com> <448E79F4.1060303@superlativ.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.hub.org X-message-flag: Outlook is rather hackable, isn't it? X-Home-Page: http://www.cbbrowne.com/info/ X-Affero: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=cbbrowne User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.19 (linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:NrLQQMBPFmLtzn/QreodaLfS8Ls= To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200606/178 X-Sequence-Number: 19535 Martha Stewart called it a Good Thing when nis@superlativ.dk (Nis Jorgensen) wrote: > J. Andrew Rogers wrote: > >> We have been using PostgreSQL on Opteron servers almost since the >> Opteron was first released, running both 32-bit and 64-bit versions of >> Linux. Both 32-bit and 64-bit versions have been bulletproof for us, >> with the usual stability I've become accustomed to with both PostgreSQL >> and Linux. We have been running nothing but 64-bit versions on >> mission-critical systems for the last year with zero problems. >> >> The short story is that for us 64-bit PostgreSQL on Opterons is >> typically something like 20% faster than 32-bit on the same, and *much* >> faster than P4 Xeon systems they nominally compete with. > > Since you sound like you have done extensive testing: > > Do you have any data regarding whether to enable hyperthreading or not? > I realize that this may be highly dependant on the OS, application and > number of CPUs, but I would be interested in hearing your > recommendations (or others'). Um, Hyper-Threading? On AMD? Hyper-Threading is a feature only offered by Intel, on some Pentium 4 chips. It is not offered by AMD. For our purposes, this is no loss; database benchmarks have widely shown it to be a performance loser across various database systems. -- output = reverse("moc.enworbbc" "@" "enworbbc") http://linuxdatabases.info/info/languages.html Yes, for sparkling white chip prints, use low SUDSing DRAW....