X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F4E152816 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:06:55 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05510-04 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 18:06:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9C4E5280A for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:06:53 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j58I6rJo009262; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 14:06:53 -0400 (EDT) To: allanvv@gmail.com Cc: pgsql-performance@postgreSQL.org Subject: Re: Performance problems, bad estimates and plan In-reply-to: <1118253770.4579.3.camel@localhost> References: <1118243044.3454.3.camel@localhost> <4362.1118250155@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1118250631.3454.6.camel@localhost> <9065.1118252356@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1118252779.4579.1.camel@localhost> <9166.1118253439@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1118253770.4579.3.camel@localhost> Comments: In-reply-to Allan Wang message dated "Wed, 08 Jun 2005 14:02:50 -0400" Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 14:06:53 -0400 Message-ID: <9261.1118254013@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.006 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200506/182 X-Sequence-Number: 12819 Allan Wang writes: > No, the tiles row doesn't join with cities: Uh-huh, so it's the same issue described here: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2005-05/msg00219.php This is fixed in CVS tip but the change was large enough that I'm disinclined to try to back-port it ... regards, tom lane