X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A9A9DC8DB for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 04:14:31 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63593-01 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 04:14:29 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.204]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D54D9DC807 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 04:14:26 -0400 (AST) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 40so1248707nzk for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:14:27 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=q2nMMWRbqb0bWXLxxWs0uOgADeRlXOCiw4c1eXtaBIYGUecFewl0dtCE52eXiqNBofeaSOYEMO+S8MMwQGNewFuTOWNTEJAhATScJIQXv3Ce3yFe1ePXdJG0HZgfj3GrgqI9tCPGooJtKTZANOGHdZOB8dPbiBleia0IysuFX0A= Received: by 10.65.124.13 with SMTP id b13mr3716656qbn; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:14:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.59.5 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:14:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <92d3a4950601170014m352c75bes@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 09:14:27 +0100 From: Antoine To: "me@alternize.com" Subject: Re: new to postgres (and db management) and performance already a problem :-( Cc: Christopher Browne , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <074b01c61b1c$538335e0$6402a8c0@iwing> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_4473_31931275.1137485667200" References: <43CC1938.7020807@gmail.com> <18875.1137451410@sss.pgh.pa.us> <070501c61aee$ed450560$6402a8c0@iwing> <22960.1137460135@sss.pgh.pa.us> <071801c61b05$7ea50c10$6402a8c0@iwing> <074b01c61b1c$538335e0$6402a8c0@iwing> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.442 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.441, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] X-Spam-Score: 0.442 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200601/217 X-Sequence-Number: 16695 ------=_Part_4473_31931275.1137485667200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 17/01/06, me@alternize.com wrote: > > > Try a), b), and c) in order on the "offending" tables as they address > > the problem at increasing cost... > > thanks alot for the detailed information! the entire concept of vacuum > isn't > yet that clear to me, so your explanations and hints are very much > appreciated. i'll defenitely try these steps this weekend when the next > full > vacuum was scheduled :-) Thanks guys, that pretty much answered my question(s) too. I have a sneakin= g suspicion that vacuuming won't do too much for us however... now that I think about it - we do very little removing, pretty much only inserts and selects. I will give it a vacuum full and see what happens. Cheers Antoine -- This is where I should put some witty comment. ------=_Part_4473_31931275.1137485667200 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline

On 17/01/06, me@alternize.com <<= a href=3D"mailto:me@alternize.com">me@alternize.com> wrote: > Try a), b), and c) in order on the "offending" tables as the= y address
> the problem at increasing cost...

thanks alot for = the detailed information! the entire concept of vacuum isn't
yet that cl= ear to me, so your explanations and hints are very much
appreciated. i'll defenitely try these steps this weekend when the next= full
vacuum was scheduled :-)

Thanks guys, that pr= etty much answered my question(s) too. I have a sneaking suspicion that vac= uuming won't do too much for us however... now that I think about it - we d= o very little removing, pretty much only inserts and selects. I will give i= t a vacuum full and see what happens.
Cheers
Antoine




--
= This is where I should put some witty comment. ------=_Part_4473_31931275.1137485667200--