X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A999DC821 for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2006 08:31:41 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10958-01 for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2006 08:31:44 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.196]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341679DC812 for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2006 08:31:38 -0400 (AST) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so834353wra for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2006 04:31:42 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=XlWKgkFZjQ76S2i0LXVLIIPRm7qp0d4cAQNkfmA9jYZtlgXQHuDaCL/j21bTvnNXW493fK2dZIbA+h4n29Cxg4gWcYsN/WHYO8/D4uAqp4oi9logs4Z6hW10VCNHaxbGZ+Bp4AZD69pJ+0og2nWT+a8zl5CDdBz463lk+N0ci9c= Received: by 10.35.36.13 with SMTP id o13mr74475pyj; Sun, 19 Mar 2006 04:31:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.37.10 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Mar 2006 04:31:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <92d3a4950603190431p43fd399aq@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 13:31:42 +0100 From: Antoine To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: partitioning MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.173 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.173] X-Spam-Score: 0.173 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200603/315 X-Sequence-Number: 17752 Hi, Is there any work on the cards for implementing other partitioning strategies? I see mysql 5.1 will have support for hashes and stuff but didn't see anything in the todos for postgres. Cheers Antoine -- This is where I should put some witty comment.