X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56B8711F67DE for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:49:17 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38568-03 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:49:15 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.193]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B84311F677D for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:49:12 -0400 (AST) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m7so16861nzf for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 12:49:12 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tX6cyisXl2mJ01iuFL9+od1AQvKJThcLoIjLcODjlRAXzlzbHoRV1eYFXyMPq07p/G+a4JOKqSpppb0S5mRhtxh2Tkuy+DrFW8PoB0Gl/vJ4Ko+MgUJxf9mZJo1Bv4ISIMYvnM43ZAiluu9IjL+DDJQ2Ev+pqGIQLL2k4OvQma8= Received: by 10.35.121.2 with SMTP id y2mr796650pym; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 12:49:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.37.10 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 12:49:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <92d3a4950603311249n5eb1e26maa9d0777d6ec70cf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 22:49:10 +0200 From: Antoine To: "Dave Dutcher" Subject: Re: [Solved] Slow performance on Windows .NET and OleDb Cc: "Greg Quinn" , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <002a01c65407$0a302730$8300a8c0@tridecap.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <000a01c653be$d312e3c0$0200a8c0@pta.homex.co.za> <002a01c65407$0a302730$8300a8c0@tridecap.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.285 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.285] X-Spam-Score: 0.285 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200603/643 X-Sequence-Number: 18080 This is a blatant thread steal... but here we go... Do people have any opinions on the pgsql driver? How does it compare with the odbc in terms of performance? Is it fully production ready? The boss wants to go .net (instead of Java, which is my preference...) - will I have to spend my time defending postgres against mysql/postgres/sqlserver? Cheers Antoine ps. I try my best not to steal threads but sometimes... :-) On 30/03/06, Dave Dutcher wrote: > I use Npgsql, and the connection string I use is real simple: > > Server=3D192.168.0.36;Database=3Dmydb;User Id=3Dmyuserid;Password=3D12345= 6 > > Hope that helps, > > Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-performance- > > owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Greg Quinn > > Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 11:57 PM > > To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org > > Subject: [PERFORM] [Solved] Slow performance on Windows .NET and OleDb > > > > This problem was caused by the OleDb driver. I used a 3rd party .NET > > provider and it worked, 8000 rows in just over 100ms! > > > > Can somebody send me a sample connection string for the PostGreSql > native > > .net driver please? I'm battling to find a valid connection string. > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that > your > > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings > -- This is where I should put some witty comment.