Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9AE79FA2C2 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 22:18:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 60020-02-5 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 22:18:36 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from toq3-srv.bellnexxia.net (toq3.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.16]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D64849FA2DE for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 22:16:44 -0300 (ADT) Received: from serenity ([70.52.64.62]) by tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20070906204622.GXTD13659.tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net@serenity>; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 16:46:22 -0400 From: "Carlo Stonebanks" To: "'James Mansion'" , "'Scott Marlowe'" Cc: "'Alvaro Herrera'" , References: <20070904230639.GA23731@alvh.no-ip.org> <3DCCF196F82444998B33F40C97B71CA4@serenity> <46E0657E.30401@mansionfamily.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <46E0657E.30401@mansionfamily.plus.com> Subject: Re: Performance on 8CPU's and 32GB of RAM Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 16:46:27 -0400 Message-ID: <9383B56B23C14CD0B66340EE36C952F9@serenity> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AcfwxgAl9m4pQl6hRyGsB9LTmto7LwAAIZxA X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6000.16480 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200709/109 X-Sequence-Number: 26654 << If what you mean is that pg has a design that's heavily oriented towards things that tend to be cheap on POSIX and doesn't use the core Win32 features effectively, then let's track that as an optimisation opportunity for the Win32 port. >> Isn't it just easier to assume that Windows Server can't do anything right? ;-)