Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.208.211])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D705C633750
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:05:01 -0400 (AST)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 46479-04-7
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:04:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC80632F0F
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:03:38 -0400 (AST)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o1Q03Yg0009478;
	Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:03:34 -0500 (EST)
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
cc: Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: No hash join across partitioned tables? 
In-reply-to: <201002252346.o1PNkXG07892@momjian.us> 
References: <201002252346.o1PNkXG07892@momjian.us>
Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
	message dated "Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:46:33 -0500"
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:03:34 -0500
Message-ID: <9477.1267142614@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.388 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=AWL=0.055,
	BAYES_00=-2.599, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201002/363
X-Sequence-Number: 37784

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Did this get addressed?

Partially.  There are stats now but autovacuum is not bright about
when to update them.

			regards, tom lane