public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Achilleas Mantzios <[email protected]>
To: Tomas Vondra <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: tds_fdw : Severe performance degradation from postgresql 10.23 to 16.4
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:05:32 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>


Στις 9/11/24 12:49, ο/η Tomas Vondra έγραψε:
> On 11/8/24 20:32, Achilleas Mantzios wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> we have hit a serious performance regression going from 10.23 → 16.4 as
>> far as tds_fdw (MS SQL) FDW is concerned. To cut the long story short, I
>> recreated the good fast “old” (pgsql 10) setup on the same vm as the
>> slow “new” (pgsql 16). Here is the bug report on github :
>>
>> https://github.com/tds-fdw/tds_fdw/issues/371
>>
>> All environment on the two pgsql clusters is shared (freetds version,
>> tds_fdw, gcc, llvm). Only thing differs are pgsql versions. The speed on
>> the old pgsql 10.23 is about 10 to 20 times higher than pgsql 16.4 . |
>> Setting client_min_messages TO debug3 does yield identical output on the
>> two systems.
>> |
>>
>> The new pgsql 16.4 shows 100% CPU usage during the query execution.
>>
>> I know we are pretty much alone with this, but it would be very nice if
>> anyone could help, see smth we are missing or guide us via the right path.
>>
> I have little experience with tds_fdw, and can't investigate that
> locally. But it might be interesting to compare CPU profiles for the two
> (slow and fast) cases. Chances are the difference will be an indication
> regarding what got that slower. It might be something in PG or in the
> FDW, hard to say.
Thank you Tomas, do you have linux-perf in mind? How could we get the 
CPU profiles of the two ?  Just in case it was not clear, the tests were 
done on the same VM, at the same time, having the two DBs listening on 
different ports. Kinda spooky from my part to do that on the production 
system, but I wanted everything to be the same (latency to/from the ms 
sql, etc) except the pgsql version, to prove my assumption, and it seems 
pgsql version is what makes the difference (in conjunction of course 
with tds_fdw ) .
>
> regards
>

view thread (13+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: tds_fdw : Severe performance degradation from postgresql 10.23 to 16.4
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox