X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B795553389 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:38:04 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 37633-02 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:37:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB3953362 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:37:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so1929792wri for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 08:37:57 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=qM487zk+db4eev2jtfbX5u+p66FgSRE/fCHmj8wxT2x2erme1HIaOUllINTBSAdFychJyYsPq5NGbjGArDRPOY0vgSFo0DqqZElst9LSWlRNOtp8Xukx+IHgHvfCrOscfxsruQHAhvbjV1nxj2dZwaix6S5PzOuc03lcDPlLSUc= Received: by 10.54.16.39 with SMTP id 39mr53395wrp; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 08:37:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.80.1.43? ([194.248.208.82]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 38sm330355wrl.2005.04.12.08.37.45; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 08:37:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <16172.1113319006@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <0201deb23790cee173bdd2d3f0e96642@gmail.com> <15725.1113316540@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4bbbc6d3a436e415be630d768d609ef6@gmail.com> <16172.1113319006@sss.pgh.pa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <9e217f24329eaf693ab6921123213178@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: PostgreSQL Perform From: Bendik R.Johansen Subject: Re: Slow update Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 17:37:42 +0200 To: Tom Lane X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.304 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, RCVD_BY_IP X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200504/234 X-Sequence-Number: 11631 Yes, I tried dropping it but it did not make a difference. Could the table be corrupt or something? Well, the important thing is that I now know that this is not typical for PostgreSQL, so I will not have to rethink my whole project. Thanks, so far. On Apr 12, 2005, at 17:16, Tom Lane wrote: > "Bendik R. Johansen" writes: >> Below is the schema for the table i will be using. I tried dropping >> the >> index, but it did not help. > >> Indexes: >> "records_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id) >> "records_category_idx" gist (category) >> "records_cid_idx" btree (cid) >> "records_uid_idx" btree (uid) > > Hmm ... my suspicion would fall first on the GIST index, to tell you > the > truth. Did you try dropping that one? > > regards, tom lane >