X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8858E9FA5C3 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 04:52:32 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17619-08 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 04:52:28 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.193]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC769FA3C0 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 04:52:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id s1so76988nze for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 00:52:26 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=owtC/LNZJLDMDMKl6e/BBLchHyHmlhwHrxWRVjDdWeoKlLUfclEnUJBnUQrRJDEgbr9tOTK+DzfvwaJ1dAOut+d1RCNlWLxAUr23jc2WF+h5w8AbPhP7wSp556m1qEf5tUpk3EY0RlMcIqb3YIlH6Ga0WnJjMGcF4vPAkk7HnAY= Received: by 10.64.156.3 with SMTP id d3mr247053qbe; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 00:52:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.75.17 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 00:52:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9e4684ce0606140052m62552d41xa9364b9d4e266c97@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 09:52:26 +0200 From: "hubert depesz lubaczewski" To: Pgsql-Performance Subject: how to partition disks MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_26035_5515386.1150271546893" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200606/240 X-Sequence-Number: 19597 ------=_Part_26035_5515386.1150271546893 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline hi i'm waiting for new server to arrive. for the server i will get hp msa1000, with 14 discs (72g, 15000 rpm). what kind of partitioning you suggest, to get maximum performance? for system things i will have separate discs, so whole array is only for postgresql. data processing is oltp, but with large amounts of write operations. any hints? should i go with 3 partitions, or just 1? or 2? depesz -- http://www.depesz.com/ - nowy, lepszy depesz ------=_Part_26035_5515386.1150271546893 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline hi
i'm waiting for new server to arrive.
for the server i will get hp msa1000, with 14 discs (72g, 15000 rpm).
what kind of partitioning you suggest, to get maximum performance?
for system things i will have separate discs, so whole array is only for postgresql.

data processing is oltp, but with large amounts of write operations.

any hints?

should i go with 3 partitions, or just 1? or 2?

depesz

--
http://www.depesz.com/ - nowy, lepszy depesz ------=_Part_26035_5515386.1150271546893--