pg.ddx.io pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedInserts or Updates
2012-02-07 10:18 UTC Ofer Israeli <oferi@checkpoint.com>
` Re: Inserts or Updates
2012-02-07 12:27 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: Inserts or Updates
2012-02-07 14:47 UTC Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>
` Re: Inserts or Updates
2012-02-07 17:27 UTC Ofer Israeli <oferi@checkpoint.com>
` Re: Inserts or Updates
2012-02-07 17:31 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: Inserts or Updates
2012-02-07 17:40 UTC Ofer Israeli <oferi@checkpoint.com>
` Re: Inserts or Updates
2012-02-07 17:43 UTC Ofer Israeli <oferi@checkpoint.com>
` Re: Inserts or Updates
2012-02-07 17:57 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: Inserts or Updates
2012-02-07 19:12 UTC Ofer Israeli <oferi@checkpoint.com>
` Re: Inserts or Updates
2012-02-07 19:20 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: Inserts or Updates
2012-02-07 19:30 UTC Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>
` Re: Inserts or Updates
2012-02-07 19:40 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: Inserts or Updates
2012-02-07 19:43 UTC Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>
` Re: Inserts or Updates
2012-02-08 19:20 UTC Ofer Israeli <oferi@checkpoint.com>
` Re: Inserts or Updates
2012-02-08 19:22 UTC Ofer Israeli <oferi@checkpoint.com>
` Re: Inserts or Updates
2012-02-09 10:09 UTC Vik Reykja <vikreykja@gmail.com>
` Re: Inserts or Updates
2012-02-09 13:28 UTC Frank Lanitz <frank@frank.uvena.de>
` Re: Inserts or Updates
2012-02-12 10:48 UTC Ofer Israeli <oferi@checkpoint.com>
` Re: Inserts or Updates
2012-02-12 18:29 UTC Frank Lanitz <frank@frank.uvena.de>
` Re: Inserts or Updates
2012-02-12 18:32 UTC Ofer Israeli <oferi@checkpoint.com>
[20+ messages in thread]
timestamp with time zone
2012-02-09 18:42 UTC Alessandro Gagliardi <alessandro@path.com>
` Re: timestamp with time zone
2012-02-09 19:46 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: timestamp with time zone
2012-02-09 20:00 UTC Alessandro Gagliardi <alessandro@path.com>
` Re: timestamp with time zone
2012-02-09 20:15 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: timestamp with time zone
2012-02-09 20:38 UTC Alessandro Gagliardi <alessandro@path.com>
` Re: timestamp with time zone
2012-02-10 06:19 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: timestamp with time zone
2012-02-10 19:53 UTC Alessandro Gagliardi <alessandro@path.com>
[7+ messages in thread]
Performance on large, append-only tables
2012-02-08 18:03 UTC David Yeu <david.yeu@skype.net>
` Re: Performance on large, append-only tables
2012-02-10 15:19 UTC Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: Performance on large, append-only tables
2012-02-10 15:33 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: Performance on large, append-only tables
2012-02-10 15:34 UTC Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>
` Re: Performance on large, append-only tables
2012-02-10 15:35 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Performance on large, append-only tables
2012-02-10 15:44 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: Performance on large, append-only tables
2012-02-10 16:19 UTC David Yeu <david.yeu@skype.net>
` Re: Performance on large, append-only tables
2012-02-10 16:26 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: Performance on large, append-only tables
2012-02-10 16:45 UTC David Yeu <david.yeu@skype.net>
` Re: Performance on large, append-only tables
2012-02-10 16:58 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: Performance on large, append-only tables
2012-02-10 17:00 UTC David Yeu <david.yeu@skype.net>
` Re: Performance on large, append-only tables
2012-02-10 17:12 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
[12+ messages in thread]
index scan forward vs backward = speed difference of 357X slower!
2012-02-07 16:49 UTC Kevin Traster <ktraster@freshgrillfoods.com>
` Re: index scan forward vs backward = speed difference of 357X slower!
2012-02-08 08:01 UTC Rural Hunter <ruralhunter@gmail.com>
` Re: index scan forward vs backward = speed difference of 357X slower!
2012-02-08 14:36 UTC Rural Hunter <ruralhunter@gmail.com>
` Re: index scan forward vs backward = speed difference of 357X slower!
2012-02-08 19:31 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: index scan forward vs backward = speed difference of 357X slower!
2012-02-08 19:58 UTC Kevin Traster <ktraster@freshgrillfoods.com>
` Re: index scan forward vs backward = speed difference of 357X slower!
2012-02-08 23:27 UTC Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: index scan forward vs backward = speed difference of 357X slower!
2012-02-08 23:31 UTC Kevin Traster <ktraster@freshgrillfoods.com>
` Re: index scan forward vs backward = speed difference of 357X slower!
2012-02-08 23:41 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
[8+ messages in thread]
pl/pgsql functions outperforming sql ones?
2012-01-27 00:09 UTC Carlo Stonebanks <stonec.register@sympatico.ca>
` Re: pl/pgsql functions outperforming sql ones?
2012-01-27 15:47 UTC Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: pl/pgsql functions outperforming sql ones?
2012-01-27 18:36 UTC Carlo Stonebanks <stonec.register@sympatico.ca>
` Re: pl/pgsql functions outperforming sql ones?
2012-01-27 19:29 UTC Deron <fecastle@gmail.com>
` Re: pl/pgsql functions outperforming sql ones?
2012-01-27 19:59 UTC Carlo Stonebanks <stonec.register@sympatico.ca>
` Re: pl/pgsql functions outperforming sql ones?
2012-01-27 20:09 UTC A.M. <agentm@themactionfaction.com>
` Re: pl/pgsql functions outperforming sql ones?
2012-01-28 06:37 UTC Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
` Re: pl/pgsql functions outperforming sql ones?
2012-01-29 04:20 UTC Carlo Stonebanks <stonec.register@sympatico.ca>
` Re: pl/pgsql functions outperforming sql ones?
2012-01-29 23:04 UTC Carlo Stonebanks <stonec.register@sympatico.ca>
` Re: pl/pgsql functions outperforming sql ones?
2012-01-30 07:56 UTC Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
` Re: pl/pgsql functions outperforming sql ones?
2012-01-30 23:15 UTC Carlo Stonebanks <stonec.register@sympatico.ca>
` Re: pl/pgsql functions outperforming sql ones?
2012-01-31 04:56 UTC Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
` Re: pl/pgsql functions outperforming sql ones?
2012-02-08 20:33 UTC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
[13+ messages in thread]
how to demonstrate the effect of direct I/O ?
2012-02-04 23:25 UTC Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
` Re: how to demonstrate the effect of direct I/O ?
2012-02-04 23:34 UTC Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
` Re: how to demonstrate the effect of direct I/O ?
2012-02-08 03:13 UTC Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
[3+ messages in thread]
Index with all necessary columns - Postgres vs MSSQL
2012-02-01 17:10 UTC Gudmundur Johannesson <gudmundur.johannesson@gmail.com>
` Re: Index with all necessary columns - Postgres vs MSSQL
2012-02-01 17:52 UTC Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: Index with all necessary columns - Postgres vs MSSQL
2012-02-01 18:32 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: Index with all necessary columns - Postgres vs MSSQL
2012-02-01 18:50 UTC Gudmundur Johannesson <gudmundur.johannesson@gmail.com>
` Re: Index with all necessary columns - Postgres vs MSSQL
2012-02-01 19:35 UTC Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: Index with all necessary columns - Postgres vs MSSQL
2012-02-02 16:41 UTC Gudmundur Johannesson <gudmundur.johannesson@gmail.com>
` Re: Index with all necessary columns - Postgres vs MSSQL
2012-02-02 20:30 UTC Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: Index with all necessary columns - Postgres vs MSSQL
2012-02-03 08:22 UTC Gudmundur Johannesson <gudmundur.johannesson@gmail.com>
` Re: Index with all necessary columns - Postgres vs MSSQL
2012-02-07 15:11 UTC Igor Neyman <ineyman@perceptron.com>
` Re: Index with all necessary columns - Postgres vs MSSQL
2012-02-07 17:59 UTC Gudmundur Johannesson <gudmundur.johannesson@gmail.com>
` Re: Index with all necessary columns - Postgres vs MSSQL
2012-02-07 19:26 UTC Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
[11+ messages in thread]
wal_level=archive gives better performance than minimal - why?
2012-01-12 23:17 UTC Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
` Re: wal_level=archive gives better performance than minimal - why?
2012-01-16 22:35 UTC Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
` Re: wal_level=archive gives better performance than minimal - why?
2012-01-17 00:29 UTC Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
` Re: wal_level=archive gives better performance than minimal - why?
2012-01-22 23:07 UTC Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
` Re: wal_level=archive gives better performance than minimal - why?
2012-02-03 18:48 UTC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
` Re: wal_level=archive gives better performance than minimal - why?
2012-02-04 16:04 UTC Cédric Villemain <cedric.villemain.debian@gmail.com>
` Re: wal_level=archive gives better performance than minimal - why?
2012-02-04 16:20 UTC Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
[7+ messages in thread]
How to remove a table statistics ?
2012-01-31 11:50 UTC Marc Mamin <M.Mamin@intershop.de>
` Re: How to remove a table statistics ?
2012-01-31 18:44 UTC Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: How to remove a table statistics ?
2012-01-31 19:36 UTC Marc Mamin <M.Mamin@intershop.de>
` Re: How to remove a table statistics ?
2012-02-03 21:56 UTC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
[4+ messages in thread]
Slow nested loop execution on larger server
2011-12-16 18:27 UTC Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
` Re: Slow nested loop execution on larger server
2011-12-16 21:16 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: Slow nested loop execution on larger server
2012-01-03 18:23 UTC Strange, John W <john.w.strange@jpmorgan.com>
` Re: Slow nested loop execution on larger server
2012-02-03 17:15 UTC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
[4+ messages in thread]
*really* bad insert performance on table with unique index
2012-02-02 17:28 UTC Jon Nelson <jnelson+pgsql@jamponi.net>
` Re: *really* bad insert performance on table with unique index
2012-02-02 20:59 UTC Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
[2+ messages in thread]
From Simple to Complex
2012-01-31 21:22 UTC Alessandro Gagliardi <alessandro@path.com>
` Re: From Simple to Complex
2012-01-31 22:10 UTC Alessandro Gagliardi <alessandro@path.com>
` Re: From Simple to Complex
2012-01-31 22:53 UTC Alessandro Gagliardi <alessandro@path.com>
` Re: From Simple to Complex
2012-01-31 23:43 UTC Alessandro Gagliardi <alessandro@path.com>
` Re: From Simple to Complex
2012-02-01 18:19 UTC Alessandro Gagliardi <alessandro@path.com>
` Re: From Simple to Complex
2012-02-01 18:35 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: From Simple to Complex
2012-02-01 18:48 UTC Alessandro Gagliardi <alessandro@path.com>
` Re: From Simple to Complex
2012-02-01 18:53 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: From Simple to Complex
2012-02-01 19:04 UTC Bob Lunney <bob_lunney@yahoo.com>
` Re: From Simple to Complex
2012-02-01 19:19 UTC Alessandro Gagliardi <alessandro@path.com>
` Re: From Simple to Complex
2012-02-02 14:52 UTC Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: From Simple to Complex
2012-02-02 19:38 UTC Alessandro Gagliardi <alessandro@path.com>
[12+ messages in thread]
Having I/O problems in simple virtualized environment
2012-01-29 22:48 UTC Ron Arts <ron.arts@gmail.com>
` Re: Having I/O problems in simple virtualized environment
2012-01-29 23:01 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: Having I/O problems in simple virtualized environment
2012-01-30 01:52 UTC Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa <ildefonso.camargo@gmail.com>
` Re: Having I/O problems in simple virtualized environment
2012-01-30 07:41 UTC Ron Arts <ron.arts@gmail.com>
` Re: Having I/O problems in simple virtualized environment
2012-01-31 21:13 UTC Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa <ildefonso.camargo@gmail.com>
[5+ messages in thread]
Why should such a simple query over indexed columns be so slow?
2012-01-30 19:13 UTC Alessandro Gagliardi <alessandro@path.com>
` Re: Why should such a simple query over indexed columns be so slow?
2012-01-30 19:24 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: Why should such a simple query over indexed columns be so slow?
2012-01-30 20:35 UTC Alessandro Gagliardi <alessandro@path.com>
` Re: Why should such a simple query over indexed columns be so slow?
2012-01-30 20:50 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: Why should such a simple query over indexed columns be so slow?
2012-01-30 20:55 UTC Alessandro Gagliardi <alessandro@path.com>
` Re: Why should such a simple query over indexed columns be so slow?
2012-01-30 20:59 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: Why should such a simple query over indexed columns be so slow?
2012-01-30 21:13 UTC Fernando Hevia <fhevia@gmail.com>
` Re: Why should such a simple query over indexed columns be so slow?
2012-01-30 21:25 UTC Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Why should such a simple query over indexed columns be so slow?
2012-01-30 21:39 UTC Alessandro Gagliardi <alessandro@path.com>
` Re: Why should such a simple query over indexed columns be so slow?
2012-01-30 21:45 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: Why should such a simple query over indexed columns be so slow?
2012-01-30 21:45 UTC Alessandro Gagliardi <alessandro@path.com>
` Re: Why should such a simple query over indexed columns be so slow?
2012-01-30 21:55 UTC Alessandro Gagliardi <alessandro@path.com>
` Re: Why should such a simple query over indexed columns be so slow?
2012-01-30 22:19 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: Why should such a simple query over indexed columns be so slow?
2012-01-30 22:24 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: Why should such a simple query over indexed columns be so slow?
2012-01-30 22:26 UTC Alessandro Gagliardi <alessandro@path.com>
` Re: Why should such a simple query over indexed columns be so slow?
2012-01-31 00:42 UTC Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
[16+ messages in thread]
Postgress is taking lot of CPU on our embedded hardware.
2012-01-27 13:34 UTC Jayashankar K B <Jayashankar.KB@lnties.com>
` Re: Postgress is taking lot of CPU on our embedded hardware.
2012-01-27 16:47 UTC Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
` Re: Postgress is taking lot of CPU on our embedded hardware.
2012-01-27 17:14 UTC Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>
` Re: Postgress is taking lot of CPU on our embedded hardware.
2012-01-27 18:30 UTC Jayashankar K B <Jayashankar.KB@lnties.com>
` Re: Postgress is taking lot of CPU on our embedded hardware.
2012-01-27 19:56 UTC Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
` Re: Postgress is taking lot of CPU on our embedded hardware.
2012-01-28 02:23 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: Postgress is taking lot of CPU on our embedded hardware.
2012-01-28 03:07 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: Postgress is taking lot of CPU on our embedded hardware.
2012-01-28 17:11 UTC Jayashankar K B <Jayashankar.KB@lnties.com>
` Re: Postgress is taking lot of CPU on our embedded hardware.
2012-01-28 17:21 UTC Jayashankar K B <Jayashankar.KB@lnties.com>
` Re: Postgress is taking lot of CPU on our embedded hardware.
2012-01-28 17:56 UTC Deron <fecastle@gmail.com>
` Re: Postgress is taking lot of CPU on our embedded hardware.
2012-01-28 18:16 UTC Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
` Re: Postgress is taking lot of CPU on our embedded hardware.
2012-01-28 19:37 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: Postgress is taking lot of CPU on our embedded hardware.
2012-01-28 23:58 UTC Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>
` Re: Postgress is taking lot of CPU on our embedded hardware.
2012-01-29 14:46 UTC Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa <ildefonso.camargo@gmail.com>
` Re: Postgress is taking lot of CPU on our embedded hardware.
2012-01-30 10:06 UTC Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>
[15+ messages in thread]
regarding CLUSTER and HUGE work_mem / maintenance_work_mem
2012-01-27 17:43 UTC Jon Nelson <jnelson+pgsql@jamponi.net>
` Re: regarding CLUSTER and HUGE work_mem / maintenance_work_mem
2012-01-27 18:05 UTC Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
` Re: regarding CLUSTER and HUGE work_mem / maintenance_work_mem
2012-01-28 02:34 UTC Jon Nelson <jnelson+pgsql@jamponi.net>
` Re: regarding CLUSTER and HUGE work_mem / maintenance_work_mem
2012-01-28 03:04 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
[4+ messages in thread]
Re: PostgreSQL Parallel Processing !
2012-01-25 09:18 UTC sridhar bamandlapally <sridhar.bn1@gmail.com>
` Re: PostgreSQL Parallel Processing !
2012-01-25 13:43 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: PostgreSQL Parallel Processing !
2012-01-25 16:18 UTC sridhar bamandlapally <sridhar.bn1@gmail.com>
` Re: PostgreSQL Parallel Processing !
2012-01-25 20:16 UTC Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: PostgreSQL Parallel Processing !
2012-01-25 20:54 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: PostgreSQL Parallel Processing !
2012-01-27 04:31 UTC sridhar bamandlapally <sridhar.bn1@gmail.com>
` Re: PostgreSQL Parallel Processing !
2012-01-27 09:06 UTC Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>
` Re: PostgreSQL Parallel Processing !
2012-01-27 09:19 UTC Vitalii Tymchyshyn <tivv00@gmail.com>
` Re: PostgreSQL Parallel Processing !
2012-01-27 09:46 UTC Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
` Re: PostgreSQL Parallel Processing !
2012-01-27 09:52 UTC Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>
` Re: PostgreSQL Parallel Processing !
2012-01-27 12:16 UTC sridhar bamandlapally <sridhar.bn1@gmail.com>
` Re: PostgreSQL Parallel Processing !
2012-01-27 12:43 UTC Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
` Re: PostgreSQL Parallel Processing !
2012-01-27 14:38 UTC Cédric Villemain <cedric.villemain.debian@gmail.com>
[13+ messages in thread]
Can lots of small writes badly hamper reads from other tables?
2012-01-24 20:16 UTC Dave Crooke <dcrooke@gmail.com>
` Re: Can lots of small writes badly hamper reads from other tables?
2012-01-24 21:06 UTC Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>
` Re: Can lots of small writes badly hamper reads from other tables?
2012-01-24 21:09 UTC Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
` Re: Can lots of small writes badly hamper reads from other tables?
2012-01-24 21:36 UTC Dave Crooke <dcrooke@gmail.com>
` Re: Can lots of small writes badly hamper reads from other tables?
2012-01-24 23:46 UTC Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
` Re: Can lots of small writes badly hamper reads from other tables?
2012-01-25 16:19 UTC Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
[6+ messages in thread]
Cursor fetch performance issue
2012-01-24 20:41 UTC Tony Capobianco <tcapobianco@prospectiv.com>
` Re: Cursor fetch performance issue
2012-01-24 20:47 UTC Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
` Re: Cursor fetch performance issue
2012-01-24 20:57 UTC Tony Capobianco <tcapobianco@prospectiv.com>
` Re: Cursor fetch performance issue
2012-01-24 21:11 UTC Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>
` Re: Cursor fetch performance issue
2012-01-24 21:11 UTC Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
` Re: Cursor fetch performance issue
2012-01-24 21:17 UTC Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
` Re: Cursor fetch performance issue
2012-01-24 21:28 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Cursor fetch performance issue
2012-01-24 21:34 UTC Tony Capobianco <tcapobianco@prospectiv.com>
` Re: Cursor fetch performance issue
2012-01-25 08:58 UTC Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
[9+ messages in thread]
spikes in pgbench read-only results
2012-01-22 23:17 UTC Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
` Re: spikes in pgbench read-only results
2012-01-23 17:03 UTC Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: spikes in pgbench read-only results
2012-01-23 17:39 UTC Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
[3+ messages in thread]
Discovering the most searched values for a field
2012-01-13 18:08 UTC alexandre - aldeia digital <adaldeia@gmail.com>
` Re: Discovering the most searched values for a field
2012-01-13 19:08 UTC Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Discovering the most searched values for a field
2012-01-23 17:26 UTC alexandre - aldeia digital <adaldeia@gmail.com>
[3+ messages in thread]
Partitioning by status?
2012-01-10 16:57 UTC Mike Blackwell <mike.blackwell@rrd.com>
` Re: Partitioning by status?
2012-01-10 17:09 UTC Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer@spamfence.net>
` Re: Partitioning by status?
2012-01-12 18:24 UTC Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Partitioning by status?
2012-01-13 10:44 UTC alexandre - aldeia digital <adaldeia@gmail.com>
` Re: Partitioning by status?
2012-01-13 19:05 UTC Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Partitioning by status?
2012-01-23 17:22 UTC alexandre - aldeia digital <adaldeia@gmail.com>
[6+ messages in thread]
when benchmarking insert , can there be caching effects?
2012-01-20 15:36 UTC Willy-Bas Loos <willybas@gmail.com>
` Re: when benchmarking insert , can there be caching effects?
2012-01-20 17:53 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
[2+ messages in thread]
auto vacuum, not working?
2012-01-13 12:08 UTC Anibal David Acosta <aa@devshock.com>
` Re: auto vacuum, not working?
2012-01-13 14:26 UTC Mario Weilguni <roadrunner6@gmx.at>
` Re: auto vacuum, not working?
2012-01-13 14:50 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: auto vacuum, not working?
2012-01-15 12:09 UTC Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
[4+ messages in thread]
partitioned table: differents plans, slow on some situations
2011-12-30 16:01 UTC Matteo Sgalaberni <sgala@sgala.com>
` Re: partitioned table: differents plans, slow on some situations
2011-12-30 16:23 UTC Marcin Mirosław <marcin@mejor.pl>
` Re: partitioned table: differents plans, slow on some situations
2011-12-30 16:35 UTC Matteo Sgalaberni <sgala@sgala.com>
` Re: partitioned table: differents plans, slow on some situations
2012-01-11 01:53 UTC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
` Re: partitioned table: differents plans, slow on some situations
2012-01-11 11:57 UTC Matteo Sgalaberni <sgala@sgala.com>
[5+ messages in thread]
[next (older)]
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox