Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Subject: Re: PSA: upgrade your extensions
From: Daniel Blanch Bataller <daniel.blanch.bataller@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAHyXU0wSxKY3OT1Hybk_Gy43ZOyr-Ly_XvCZxRPk+_D+yh2anQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 16:18:28 +0100
Cc: postgres performance list <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <ADBA8F9D-2BD2-4FED-B937-6B00556E1DE7@gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAHyXU0wSxKY3OT1Hybk_Gy43ZOyr-Ly_XvCZxRPk+_D+yh2anQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org

Hi Merlin:

Any EXPLAIN on the query affected? size of indexes before and after reindex?

Regards,

Daniel.


> El 1 feb 2017, a las 13:38, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> escribi=
=C3=B3:
>=20
> I was just troubleshooting a strange performance issue with pg_trgm
> (greatest extension over) that ran great in testing but poor in
> production following a 9.6 in place upgrade from 9.2. By poor I mean
> 7x slower.  Problem was resolved by ALTER EXTENSION UPDATE followed by
> a REINDEX on the impacted table.  Hope this helps somebody at some
> point :-).
>=20
> merlin
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


--=20
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance