Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U2TOT-0003jm-28 for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:16:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U2TOR-00007j-Sq for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:15:59 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([87.238.57.229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U2TNN-0008VJ-2v for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:14:53 +0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com ([209.85.212.175]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U2TNK-0007EO-AY for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:14:52 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id l13so2936946wie.2 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 13:14:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=fmPYgql+9eBAo+dy3bpR7CaSF6XAg3LPXZb/UEovlX8=; b=M60fe+APrtVCd6uQBiPB1D9bXb/nFEEyUshsd7KzQS7A3LElasxiO3CUwksJeVWnmu h1CLbbT1WLLws7IikIrC+nXtSs2CTX2Sv2WNCFARDmgKHAgwR9BuZAQKVCSF16ijXNN+ iNVVg+RyPzZVrXNxP1VfBzVcVyAHrcx+5p56pdh2nSbyrCfriBLPCADQDMnXRIplwJbD UnK2F/naO6SEHZ4QiIbH16Fry6VF0hNmSKyaL7pl31OOFwLbMogcdMnDe7ayQpwPddEd 3lISMf/UPnjQDnCXPSKSgI+YMVoUy1Qp+N+Mn65BYFbW+2DDJBBrdFtA0Z0O3+K4ef4q Q2QQ== X-Received: by 10.194.118.166 with SMTP id kn6mr2962617wjb.18.1360012489055; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 13:14:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.55] (cpc16-aztw25-2-0-cust224.aztw.cable.virginmedia.com. [77.102.173.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ex1sm2428600wib.7.2013.02.04.13.14.46 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Feb 2013 13:14:48 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_23D53144-4E2D-445C-BC51-B4DF83F9959F" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: Simple join doesn't use index From: Dan Fairs In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 21:14:58 +0000 Cc: Alex Vinnik , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Message-Id: References: To: =?utf-8?Q?Filip_Rembia=C5=82kowski?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-performance Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org --Apple-Mail=_23D53144-4E2D-445C-BC51-B4DF83F9959F Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Yeah.. I came across pgtune but noticed that latest version dated = 2009-10-29 http://pgfoundry.org/frs/?group_id=3D1000416 which is kind of = outdated. Tar file has settings for pg 8.3. Is still relevant? >=20 > Yes, I'm sure it will not do anything bad to your config.=20 > =20 Apologies for leaping in a little late, but I note the version on Github = has been updated much more recently: https://github.com/gregs1104/pgtune Cheers, Dan -- Dan Fairs | dan.fairs@gmail.com | @danfairs | secondsync.com --Apple-Mail=_23D53144-4E2D-445C-BC51-B4DF83F9959F Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Yeah.. = I came across pgtune but noticed that latest version dated = 2009-10-29 http://pgfoundry.org/frs/?group_id=3D1000416 which is kind of outdated. Tar = file has settings for pg 8.3. Is still relevant?

Yes, I'm sure it will not do anything = bad to your config. =
 

Apologies for = leaping in a little late, but I note the version on Github has been = updated much more recently:


Cheers,
Dan
dan.fairs@gmail.com | @danfairs = | secondsync.com

= --Apple-Mail=_23D53144-4E2D-445C-BC51-B4DF83F9959F--