X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D9AD52B81 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 16:48:39 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00978-05 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 19:48:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.Mi8.com (nycgw05.mi8.com [63.240.6.46]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667F8529B6 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 16:48:33 -0300 (ADT) Received: from 172.16.1.112 by mail.Mi8.com with ESMTP (- GW05 Welcome to Mi8 Corporation www.Mi8.com); Mon, 01 Aug 2005 15:48:27 -0400 X-Server-Uuid: E0C866E6-C6CD-48B5-AE61-E57E73CF3CC7 Received: from MI8NYCMAIL06.Mi8.com ([172.16.1.175]) by D01SMTP02.Mi8.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 1 Aug 2005 15:48:26 -0400 Received: from 141.156.39.156 ([141.156.39.156]) by MI8NYCMAIL06.Mi8.com ([172.16.1.219]) via Exchange Front-End Server mi8owa.mi8.com ( [172.16.1.104]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 15:48:26 -0500 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.1.0.040913 Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 15:48:35 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCHES] COPY FROM performance improvements From: "Alon Goldshuv" To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Cc: "Luke Lonergan" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Aug 2005 19:48:26.0998 (UTC) FILETIME=[FBFDE960:01C596D1] X-WSS-ID: 6EF0A30126S57177-01-01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.581 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO X-Spam-Level: * X-Archive-Number: 200508/6 X-Sequence-Number: 13753 Tom, >> I've attached it here, sorry to the list owner for the patch inclusion / >> off-topic. > > This patch appears to reverse out the most recent committed changes in > copy.c. Which changes do you refer to? I thought I accommodated all the recent changes (I recall some changes to the tupletable/tupleslot interface, HEADER in cvs, and hex escapes and maybe one or 2 more). What did I miss? Thanks. Alon.