X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A63A9DCAD2 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 02:23:03 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 77809-05 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 02:23:03 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from mail.Mi8.com (d01gw01.mi8.com [63.240.6.47]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B7E9DCAAA for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 02:23:00 -0400 (AST) Received: from 172.16.1.112 by mail.Mi8.com with ESMTP (- Welcome to Mi8 Corporation www.Mi8.com (D1)); Sat, 25 Feb 2006 01:22:51 -0500 X-Server-Uuid: 241911D6-425B-44B9-A073-E3FE0F8FC774 Received: from MI8NYCMAIL06.Mi8.com ([172.16.1.175]) by D01SMTP02.Mi8.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 25 Feb 2006 01:22:51 -0500 Received: from 69.181.100.71 ([69.181.100.71]) by MI8NYCMAIL06.Mi8.com ( [172.16.1.219]) via Exchange Front-End Server mi8owa.mi8.com ( [172.16.1.106]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 06:22:50 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.1.051004 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 22:22:49 -0800 Subject: Re: Reliability recommendations From: "Luke Lonergan" To: "Mark Kirkwood" cc: "Dan Gorman" , "Joshua D. Drake" , "Craig A. James" , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [PERFORM] Reliability recommendations Thread-Index: AcY50+Y4JREnwqXHEdqbDgANk63kWA== In-Reply-To: <43FFF4EF.6060601@paradise.net.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Feb 2006 06:22:51.0356 (UTC) FILETIME=[E7A041C0:01C639D3] X-WSS-ID: 6FE1283131W11352612-01-01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.351 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.098, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.253] X-Spam-Score: 1.351 X-Spam-Level: * X-Archive-Number: 200602/403 X-Sequence-Number: 17389 Mark, On 2/24/06 10:10 PM, "Mark Kirkwood" wrote: > Well, since this is always fun (2G memory, 3Ware 7506, 4xPATA), writing: > > $ dd if=/dev/zero of=/data0/dump/bigfile bs=8k count=500000 > 500000 records in > 500000 records out > 4096000000 bytes transferred in 32.619208 secs (125570185 bytes/sec) > Reading: > > $ dd of=/dev/null if=/data0/dump/bigfile bs=8k count=500000 > 500000 records in > 500000 records out > 4096000000 bytes transferred in 24.067298 secs (170189442 bytes/sec) Not bad at all! I have one of these cards in my home machine running WinXP and it's not nearly this fast. > Hmmm - a bit humbled by Luke's machinery :-), however, mine is probably > competitive on (MB/s)/$.... Not sure - the machines I cite are about $10K each. The machine you tested was probably about $1500 a few years ago (my guess), and with a 5:1 ratio in speed versus about a 6:1 ratio in price, we're not too far off in MB/s/$ after all :-) > It would be interesting to see what Dan's system would do on a purely > sequential workload - as 40-50MB of purely random IO is high. Yeah - that is really high if the I/O is really random. I'd normally expect maybe 500-600 iops / second and if each IO is 8KB, that would be 4MB/s. The I/O is probably not really completely random, or it's random over cachable bits of the occupied disk area. - Luke